Accueil des réfugiés en France : le point de vue des Français d’origine maghrébine et des Français « natifs »

Silva, Caroline da; Badea, Constantina; Gruev‐Vintila, Andreea

doi:10.1016/j.psfr.2021.04.002

Cited by 2 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 39 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…As such, French national identity is generally viewed as being 'exclusive' (Badea, 2012;Kamiejski et al, 2012a;Ocak, 2016;Simon, 2012Simon, , 2013. 2 Significantly, higher French National Identification predicts negative diversity responses (Adam-Troian et al, 2019;Badea, 2012;Badea et al, 2018;Da Silva et al, 2021;Pehrson et al, 2009;Weldon, 2006).…”

Section: Blm Support In France: How National Identification Mattersmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The aim of the second study is to assess whether National Identification and Laïcité endorsement represent reliable predictors of French responses to BLM at another point in time. Notably, most scholars agree that over the past 15 years French national identity fosters unfavorable responses toward diversity issues (Adam- Troian et al, 2019;Badea, 2012;Badea & Aebischer, 2017;Badea et al, 2018;Da Silva et al, 2021;Pehrson et al, 2009;Weldon, 2006). Similarly, both Laïcité have been found to be reliable predictors of contrasting diversity outcomes across time (Anier et al, 2018;Kamiejski et al, 2012b;Roebroeck & Guimond, 2017).…”

Section: Studymentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Black Lives Matter… but to Whom? An Examination of Nationally-Grounded Determinants of Black Lives Matter Support

Lankester,

Alexopoulos

2023

International Review of Social Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Black Lives Matter (BLM) has gained momentum in its fight against racism crossnationally. Yet, there are conflicting opinions on BLM. To account for this, previous research relied on cross-national predictors (e.g., Social Dominance Orientation; SDO). However, BLM support needs to be examined via the prism of national contexts and their peculiarities. Here, we claim that nationally-grounded determinants (next to cross-national ones) shape BLM (dis-)approval. Based on national identity construal, we argue that the way individuals identify with it predicts BLM support. Further, we expect this relationship to be mediated by personal endorsement of national beliefs about diversity. This claim was tested in a French ecological context, where: 1) national identity is based on a straitened view of diversity and 2) diversity issues are regulated via two antagonistic cultural norms: one is egalitarian (i.e., Historic Laïcité) and the other is assimilationist (i.e., New Laïcité). In two pre-registered and well-powered studies (Study 1, N = 305; Study 2, N = 489), we anticipated and found that National Identification negatively predicts BLM support. Crucially, cultural norm endorsements dually-mediated this relationship, suggesting their instrumental function in BLM support. We considered, via path analysis, an additional pathway involving SDO. We found that nationally-grounded and cross-national paths operate jointly to shape BLM support. We replicated these results one year later, providing support for our model. These findings are of relevance beyond the French context as they contribute to an emerging literature examining how intra-and inter-national forces shape, in tandem, diversity responses.

show abstract

Section: Blm Support In France: How National Identification Mattersmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Studymentioning

confidence: 99%

Black Lives Matter… but to Whom? An Examination of Nationally-Grounded Determinants of Black Lives Matter Support

Lankester,

Alexopoulos

2023

International Review of Social Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Those within this boundary are considered entitled to our help and personal sacrifices, as well as fair treatment (Opotow, 1990(Opotow, , 1993. People in our moral ingroup fall within the scope of justice, which means that they can expect that our behavior toward them would be governed by fairness (Deutsch, 1973;Opotow, 1990) and by a prosocial orientation (da Silva et al, 2021). In other words, when members of our moral ingroup are in need, we would offer them help, and in the face of injustice, we would stand up for their rights.…”

Section: Political Discourse Can Create Norms Of Moral Inclusionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“Put a Little Love in Your Heart”: Acceptance of Paternalistic and Ally Political Discourses Both Predict Pro‐Roma Solidarity Intentions Through Moral Inclusion

Kende

Nariman

Nyúl

et al. 2022

Political Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The way politicians talk about minorities institutes the normative context of intergroup relations. We investigated how endorsement of different political discourses predicts donation and collective action intentions by majority members toward the Roma in five European countries. The survey was conducted online using samples demographically similar to the populations of Hungary, Slovakia, Romania, France, and Ireland (N = 5,054). First, results showed that accepting paternalistic discourse versus discourse promoting allyship were not distinguishable; both promoted higher moral inclusion which in turn predicted higher prosocial intentions. Second, donations (i.e., immediate relief) and collective action (i.e., social change action) were driven by identical factors. Third, acceptance of openly hostile political discourse neither predicted moral exclusion, nor lower prosocial intentions. In summary, our research provides important evidence that when it comes to Roma—non‐Roma relations, the previously established distinction between solidarity intentions that aim to solidify status relations versus bring about social change is completely blurred, presumably because of the social context in which any positive message communicates moral inclusion challenging the hostile status quo.

show abstract

Accueil des réfugiés en France : le point de vue des Français d’origine maghrébine et des Français « natifs »

Cited by 2 publications

References 39 publications

Black Lives Matter… but to Whom? An Examination of Nationally-Grounded Determinants of Black Lives Matter Support

Black Lives Matter… but to Whom? An Examination of Nationally-Grounded Determinants of Black Lives Matter Support

“Put a Little Love in Your Heart”: Acceptance of Paternalistic and Ally Political Discourses Both Predict Pro‐Roma Solidarity Intentions Through Moral Inclusion

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About