Accruing individual potential for creativity and innovation in biotechnology firms

Raqshin, Samar; Nirjar, Abhishek

doi:10.1504/ijil.2012.045174

Cited by 8 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 42 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…It stimulates employees’ knowledge, satisfaction level, creative capacity and free flow of ideas (Bullinger et al , 2007). Innovation is also encouraged by several factors such as promotion of job autonomy, increasing emotional intelligence and cognitive ability of employees and taking necessary risks (Rank et al , 2004; Dixit and Nanada, 2011; Raqshin and Nirjar, 2012; Harvey et al , 2015; Da Costa et al , 2015; Martin-Rios and Ciobanu, 2019). Organizational culture offers flexibility to employees to form mental models, workplace meaningfulness and a learning environment to adopt innovative flexibility in developing new products and services in response to market demand at a low cost (Ni et al , 2021).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Understanding the drivers of innovation in an organization: a literature review

Dani

Gandhi

2021

IJIS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose Innovation is an engine that drives the organization and allows it to outcompete in the economic environment. This paper aims to analyze scientific publications between 1980 and January 2021 concerning innovation indicators at organizational and individual levels. The study identifies 11 unique indicators to evaluate innovation, thus enhancing existing knowledge in the domain. Design/methodology/approach A total of 175 randomly selected journal articles were systematically analyzed. Findings While innovation has received significant attention in the commercial sector, the focus on the construct in academic research has remained relatively narrow. The analysis offers a comprehensive view of innovation drivers at an organizational and individual level. Research limitations/implications The literature review offers a deeper understanding of the indicators of innovation impacting organizational performance. Originality/value The analysis and methodology discussed aim to assist managers, researchers and policymakers in comprehending the various innovation indicators; such understanding may enhance individual and organizational efficiency.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Understanding the drivers of innovation in an organization: a literature review

Dani

Gandhi

2021

IJIS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Levels of conviction that one can perform given assignments indicates the strength of perceived efficacy (Brouwer et al, 2010). Students with high self-efficacy are likely to make insistent determinations, conscientiousness, persistence, and grit (Lightsey et al, 2011;Raqshin and Nirjar, 2012;Datu et al, 2017). A typical trait of these learners is a desire to achieve excellent results, a higher enthusiasm toward learning, extensive reading, and researching, not easily disappointed, and view failure positively (Al Mutir, 2015;Shikalepoh, 2016).…”

Section: Self-efficacymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Centered on the review of literature, it can be clinched that students with high self-efficacy have greater objectives and are more dedicated to accomplishing them. Developing people's ambitions, choosing specific actions, applying a great deal of effort, and having persistence despite challenges are the results of their belief that they can succeed (Raqshin and Nirjar, 2012). Grit plays a major role in the achievement of objectives since it motivates learners to adhere to their plans and to be committed and perseverant in goal setting (Duckworth, 2016) and it is one of the characteristics that can enable a learner to persevere in challenging circumstances, and it is enhanced by self-efficacy and it enhances commitment to a significant objective despite the disappointment.…”

Section: Implications and Future Directionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Exploring the Conceptual Constructs of Learners’ Goal Commitment, Grit, and Self-Efficacy

Han

2021

Front. Psychol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Although learners’ success in learning has generally been attributed to cognitive factors, non-cognitive issues in education should be taken into consideration in the process of learning which affects learners’ achievement. One of these issues, which become popular among researchers in the previous decade is grit, that is, posited as passion and perseverance thanks to its enduring quality and the other is self-efficacy. Another factor is goal commitment that talks about the way to reach a goal or insistent determinations to achieve a goal. The proposed review attempts to focus on these three factors in regulating students’ learning achievement. Accordingly, some educational suggestions are offered for teachers, students, and syllabus designers.

show abstract

“…The strength of perceived efficacy is measured by degrees of certainty that one can perform given tasks (Brouwer et al, 2010). Students who have high self-efficacy tend to make persistent efforts, diligence, tenacity, and perseverance (Datu, Yuen, & Chen, 2017;Lightsey Jr, Maxwell, Nash, Rarey, & McKinney, 2011;Raqshin & Nirjar, 2012). Also, they usually target high scores, have a greater curiosity to learn, actively ask questions in class, love to read and review literature, not easily discouraged, and consider failure to be a positive motivation (Al Mutir, 2015;Shikalepoh, 2016).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The College Academic Self-Efficacy Scale (CASES); An Indonesian Validation to Measure the Self-Efficacy of Students

Ifdil

Bariyyah

Dewi

et al. 2019

JKBK

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study examines the inventory properties of the Indonesian version of The College Academic Self-Efficacy Scale (CASES) which is originally Western, and was developed by Owen, S. V., & Froman, R. D. in 1988 to determine the level of student self-efficacy. The multi-stage random sampling method was used with 342 students as participants in Indonesia. Furthermore, the validity was analyzed using Cronbach's alpha item analysis that shows the coefficient of α > .3, and the data showed that 33 items of Indonesian CASES were valid. In addition, as regards reliability, Cronbach's alpha was also used for the analysis, and the result shows that reliability coefficient of the Indonesian version of CASES was .931. Furthermore, it was concluded that the validity of CASES was satisfying to measure students' self-efficacy, and the construct of Indonesian CASES can be helpful and applicable in understanding student self-efficacy and ready to be used in subsequent researches.

show abstract

Accruing individual potential for creativity and innovation in biotechnology firms

Cited by 8 publications

References 42 publications

Understanding the drivers of innovation in an organization: a literature review

Understanding the drivers of innovation in an organization: a literature review

Exploring the Conceptual Constructs of Learners’ Goal Commitment, Grit, and Self-Efficacy

The College Academic Self-Efficacy Scale (CASES); An Indonesian Validation to Measure the Self-Efficacy of Students

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About