2018
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty1950
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accretion in common envelope evolution

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
116
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(119 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
3
116
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During the GEE the secondary star increases its mass, almost doubling it (thin blue line in the lower panel). To prevent the expansion of the secondary star as a result of the high mass accretion, the jets must carry out large amounts of energy and to remove high entropy gas from the vicinity of the secondary star (Shiber et al 2016;Chamandy et al 2018). As Abu-Backer et al (2018) already noted, the rotation of the accreting star (which we do not treat here) complicates the accretion process (e.g., Kunitomo et al 2017).…”
Section: Preventing the Cee And Forming Sne Iibmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…During the GEE the secondary star increases its mass, almost doubling it (thin blue line in the lower panel). To prevent the expansion of the secondary star as a result of the high mass accretion, the jets must carry out large amounts of energy and to remove high entropy gas from the vicinity of the secondary star (Shiber et al 2016;Chamandy et al 2018). As Abu-Backer et al (2018) already noted, the rotation of the accreting star (which we do not treat here) complicates the accretion process (e.g., Kunitomo et al 2017).…”
Section: Preventing the Cee And Forming Sne Iibmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…is the total initial mass of the tight binary system. Although high mass accretion rates are possible inside a common envelope (e.g., Chamandy et al (2018)), this is a too high mass accretion rate for low mass main sequence stars, and we assume that the actual mass accretion rate is only about one percent of that rate, namelyṀ 23,…”
Section: Numerical Set-upmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, in a recent paper Chamandy et al (2018) find high accretion rates when they use a subgrid 'valve mechanism' that removes energy, hence reduces pressure, from the vicinity of the accreting companion. Jets can remove energy as in the subgrid prescription of Chamandy et al (2018).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%