2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.22021.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accretion flow diagnostics with X-ray spectral timing: the hard state of SWIFT J1753.5-0127

Abstract: Recent XMM-Newton studies of X-ray variability in the hard states of black hole X-ray binaries (BHXRBs) indicate that the variability is generated in the 'standard' optically thick accretion disc that is responsible for the multi-colour blackbody emission. The variability originates in the disc as mass-accretion fluctuations and propagates through the disc to 'light up' inner disc regions, eventually modulating the power-law emission that is produced relatively centrally. Both the covariance spectra and time-l… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
29
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
4
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1999a, Nowak 2000 and other BHXRBs (e.g. Cassatella et al 2012, Grinberg et al 2014 we conclude that three variability components are sufficient to obtain a good description of the hard-state broad-band noise of GX 339-4 within the analysed frequency window (i.e. up to frequencies of 20 Hz).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1999a, Nowak 2000 and other BHXRBs (e.g. Cassatella et al 2012, Grinberg et al 2014 we conclude that three variability components are sufficient to obtain a good description of the hard-state broad-band noise of GX 339-4 within the analysed frequency window (i.e. up to frequencies of 20 Hz).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…All the PSDs show a similar shape, with two broad humps, whose intensity and characteristic frequencies clearly change as a function of both luminosity and energy. Grinberg et al 2014;Cassatella et al 2012). At frequencies lower than those covered here the variability power per unit logarithmic interval (νP ν ) is expected to drop in the hard state (band-limited noise).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3.2), and subsequently used in a number of other analyses of data from AGN and XRBs Middleton et al 2011;Cassatella et al 2012a;Kara et al 2013b;Cackett et al 2013). The covariance spectrum 6 is the cross-spectral counterpart of the rmsspectrum, which measures the rms amplitude of variability as a detailed function of energy.…”
Section: The Rms and Covariance Spectrummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since disc variations drive the harder X-ray variability (at least the lower-frequency component, , it seems likely that the stabilisation of disc variability is not strictly linked to the state transition itself but occurs continuously with the overall spectral softening of the source which begins in the hard state, perhaps linked to rises in overall accretion rate that trigger the state transition. Recent work looking at disc variabil-ity in XMM-Newton data from hard states of SWIFT J1753.5-0127 strongly supports this picture, showing that the disc is less variable in a softer, higher-luminosity hard state than in a harder, lower-luminosity harder state (Cassatella et al 2012a). Data from the Swift observatory, which enabled monitoring of the soft and hard X-ray variability of SWIFT J1753.5-0127 throughout a mini-outburst, also supports this picture (Kalamkar et al 2013).…”
Section: Towards a Unified Picturementioning
confidence: 80%
“…The simplest interpretation is that this variability is intrinsic to the corona, hot inner flow, or base of the jet -whichever region produces the power-law emission. However, this need not be the case: mass accretion variations at higher Fourier frequencies in the disc could be filtered by the more extended disc emissivity profile to suppress the variability of the direct disc emission at these frequencies Cassatella et al 2012a). It remains an important open question as to whether or not the disc is responsible for driving all the non-jet continuum variability, or only that on longer time-scales.…”
Section: Towards a Unified Picturementioning
confidence: 99%