1999
DOI: 10.1086/307827
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accretion Disks in Pre–Planetary Nebulae

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
61
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because low-mass companions do not release enough orbital energy to eject the envelope, as the orbital separation is reduced, the differential gravitational force due to the proto-WD tidally shreds the companion. The disrupted companion then forms a disk inside the CE that subsequently accretes onto the proto-WD (22). For more detail on the onset and dynamics of the CE phase for post-MS giants and low-mass companions (i.e., low, mass-ratio binaries), see refs.…”
Section: Common Envelope Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because low-mass companions do not release enough orbital energy to eject the envelope, as the orbital separation is reduced, the differential gravitational force due to the proto-WD tidally shreds the companion. The disrupted companion then forms a disk inside the CE that subsequently accretes onto the proto-WD (22). For more detail on the onset and dynamics of the CE phase for post-MS giants and low-mass companions (i.e., low, mass-ratio binaries), see refs.…”
Section: Common Envelope Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the field generated in the envelope cannot diffuse to the WD surface, an alternative possibility is amplification in an accretion disk that forms when the companion is tidally disrupted inside the common envelope (22). As shown below, this scenario is attractive because it provides a natural mechanism for transporting the field to the proto-WD surface.…”
Section: Amplification Of Magnetic Fieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the companion is of low mass ( brown dwarf or planet), it enters the AGB star and spirals in toward the core, where it is gravitationally shredded to form a disk that may blow jets through the envelope (Soker 1996;Reyes-Ruiz & López 1999;Nordhaus & Blackman 2006). A very low mass secondary has insufficient energy to eject much of the AGB envelope during the spiral-in process, so it does not naturally lead to the formation of a massive torus.…”
Section: Primary Accretion Disksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four different types of scenario have been proposed for the formation of the jets: a magnetic wind from single stars (García-Segura et al 2005); an accretion disk around a binary companion, fed by the mass loss of the primary ( Morris 1987;Soker & Rappaport 2000); a magnetic ( possibly explosive) wind from the primary, spun up by a companion (e.g., Nordhaus & Blackman 2006;Matt et al 2006); and an accretion disk around the core of the primary, formed by the overflow or breakup of a binary companion during or after a common envelope phase (Soker & Livio 1994;Soker 1996;Reyes-Ruiz & López 1999;Nordhaus & Blackman 2006). In all these cases the region of jet launching is too small to be resolved by current observations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dusty component of the outflows may imply that these, after emanating from the central regions of K 3-35, have entrained material from these inner regions, thus revealing additional interaction between the fast outflows and the dust cocoon. In these regards, K 3-35 is a notorious case study for models where high-velocity jets and disks are the basic ingredient in the shaping of the most axisymmetric PNe (Morris 1987;Soker 1996;Reyes-Ruiz & López 1999;Sahai & Trauger 1998;Soker & Rappaport 2000;Nordhaus & Blackman 2006;Huggins 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%