Accreditation of the toxicological screening: recommendations of the SFBC-SFTA group

Guitton, Jérôme; Gaulier, Jean-Michel; Citterio-Quentin, Antony; Abé, Emuri; Allibe, Nathalie; Bartoli, M.; Cohen, Sabine; Monteil-Ganière, Catherine; Garcia-Hejl, C.; Grosjean, Jérôme; Richard, Damien; Roman, Emilie; Saint-Marcoux, Franck; Wendremaire, Maëva

doi:10.1684/abc.2019.1422

Cited by 3 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This technique is primarily suited for volatile compounds or those likely to be vaporized and thermostable. Interpretation of the results must also consider toxicokinetics, toxic effects based on age [8,24,25], the time between admission and the sample collection, which may explain the decrease in detectable concentrations of certain xenobiotics [17].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Interest of toxicological analysis in patients admitted to a pediatric emergency department

Ghizlane.Berdai,

Nada.Benbouziane,

Imane.Rahmoune

et al. 2024

World J. Biol. Pharm. Res.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: Evaluate the interest of toxicology screening in the management of patients in a pediatric emergency department, by assessing its diagnostic utility. Patients and Methods: This is a retrospective cross-sectional study conducted over two years in the Emergency Department of the Abderrahim Harouchi Mother and Child Hospital, of the Ibn Rochd University Hospital in Casablanca, Morocco. We included all children who underwent qualitative toxicological screening by Gas Chromatography coupled with Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS). A descriptive analysis was conducted on the clinical and toxicological characteristics of the patients. The contingency test allowed us to compare the context of the toxicological screening request and its diagnostic utility. Results: Eighty-seven children were included, with a Male-to Female sex ratio of 1.2. The age of the patients ranged from 1 month to 14 years, with a median of three years. Among the included population, 119 screenings were performed. Drugs were implicated in 27 cases, while 4 pesticide intoxications were found, including carbofuron, chloralose, methomyl and terbucarb, along with 2 cannabis intoxications. A proportion of 88% of screening requests, made in the absence of clinical guidance, turned out to be positive, accounting for 31% (24 cases out of 77) (p<0.001). Conclusion: Toxicological analysis is a valuable tool to assist the clinician in managing intoxications by confirming or excluding the toxic hypothesis. However, toxicological analysis can only be useful and effective, avoiding analytical pitfalls, in the presence of dialogue between the clinician and the analyst.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Interest of toxicological analysis in patients admitted to a pediatric emergency department

Ghizlane.Berdai,

Nada.Benbouziane,

Imane.Rahmoune

et al. 2024

World J. Biol. Pharm. Res.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Untitled

2024

World J. Biol. Pharm. Res.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Validation of quantification methods was based on the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidelines for bioanalytical method validation [7] (Table 1). Toxicological screening methods were validated according to SFBC-SFTA recommendations [8].…”

Section: Systematic Toxicological Investigationsmentioning

confidence: 99%