2018
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.k4647
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accreditation—a verification ritual lacking verification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our study extends the range of outcomes of MCSs examined in the literature beyond positive, negative and neutral attitudes to control systems (Tessier and Otley, 2012) to include ambivalent attitudes. Finally, our findings highlight the complexity of accreditation implementation (Brubakk et al, 2015) and respond to calls to further examine implementation of health service accreditation (Greenfield and Braithwaite, 2008;Wilson, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Our study extends the range of outcomes of MCSs examined in the literature beyond positive, negative and neutral attitudes to control systems (Tessier and Otley, 2012) to include ambivalent attitudes. Finally, our findings highlight the complexity of accreditation implementation (Brubakk et al, 2015) and respond to calls to further examine implementation of health service accreditation (Greenfield and Braithwaite, 2008;Wilson, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Finally, we respond to calls to further examine implementation of health service accreditation (Greenfield and Braithwaite, 2008; Wilson, 2018). Our findings highlight the complexity of accreditation implementation (Brubakk et al , 2015) where multiple organisational dualities are brought into juxtaposition through the various features of an external control system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations