1994
DOI: 10.1016/0165-4101(94)90032-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accounting information and internal performance evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
54
1
8

Year Published

1999
1999
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 162 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
5
54
1
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Most 'baths' involve write offs that impact net income but not operating income. As a robustness check, we also measure accounting performance using return on assets (ROA) measured as net income divided by total assets (e.g., Blackwell et al 1994;Mehran 1995). The ROA results are qualitatively the same as the operating income results unless otherwise noted.…”
Section: Dependent Variablementioning
confidence: 61%
“…Most 'baths' involve write offs that impact net income but not operating income. As a robustness check, we also measure accounting performance using return on assets (ROA) measured as net income divided by total assets (e.g., Blackwell et al 1994;Mehran 1995). The ROA results are qualitatively the same as the operating income results unless otherwise noted.…”
Section: Dependent Variablementioning
confidence: 61%
“…A negative relation between the likelihood of non-routine CEO turnover and firm performance is documented in studies by Coughlan and Schmidt (1985), Warner et al (1988), Weisbach (1988, Gibbons and Murphy (1990), Murphy and Zimmerman (1993), Blackwell et al (1994), andKang andShivdasani (1995). In addition, a number of studies document that the market for corporate control plays an important disciplinary role, as managerial turnover is high in firms that are targets of acquisitions, especially if their pre-acquisition performance is poor (Martin and McConnell (1991), Kini et al (1995), Hadlock et al (1999), andHarford (2000)).…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…By using industryadjusted forecast errors in our analysis, we attempt to control for industry-wide events that affect performance. Previous research on CEO turnover decisions provides evidence suggesting that relative performance evaluation is utilized in retention decisions (e.g., Barro and Barro, 1990;Blackwell et al, 1994). Therefore, our first hypothesis predicts that there will be an inverse relation between the likelihood of CEO turnover and industry-adjusted analyst forecast errors and 3 Expectations management is consistent with the management literature regarding impressions management, which includes the idea that top management is expected to not only manage a firm's performance but also the perceptions of the firm's performance (e.g., Ginzel et al, 1992).…”
Section: One-year Forecast Errors As a Measure Of Ceo Performancementioning
confidence: 99%