Accounting for variability among individual pigs in deterministic growth models

Abstract

Inclusion of variation in deterministic nutritional models for growth by repeating simulations using different sets of parameters has been performed in literature without or with only hypothetic consideration of the covariance structure among parameters. However, a description of the structure of links among parameters describing individuals is required to generate realistic sets of parameters. In this study, the mean and covariance structure of model parameters describing feed intake and growth were analyzed from 10 batches of crossbred gilts and barrows. Data were obtained from different crossbreeds, originating from Large White 3 Landrace sows and nine sire lines. Pigs were group-housed (12 pigs/pen) and performance testing was carried out from 70 days of age to ,110 kg BW. Daily feed intake (DFI) was recorded using automatic feeding stations and BW was measured at least every 3 weeks. A growth model was used to characterize individual pigs based on the observed DFI and BW. In this model, a Gompertz function was used to describe protein deposition and the resulting BW gain. A gamma function (expressing DFI as multiples of maintenance) was used to express the relationship between DFI and BW. Each pig was characterized through a set of five parameters: BW 70 (BW at 70 days of age), B Gompertz (a precocity parameter) PDm (mean protein deposition rate) and DFI 50 and DFI 100 (DFI at 50 and 100 kg BW, respectively). The data set included profiles for 1288 pigs for which no eating or growth disorders were observed (e.g. because of disease). All parameters were affected by sex (except for BW 70 ) and batch, but not by the crossbreed (except for PDm). An interaction between sex and crossbreed was observed for PDm (P , 0.01) and DFI 100 (P 5 0.05). Different covariance matrices were computed according to the batch, sex, crossbreed, or their combinations, and the similarity of matrices was evaluated using the Flury hierarchy. As covariance matrices were all different, the unit of covariance (subpopulation) corresponded to the combination of batch, sex and crossbreed. Two generic covariance matrices were compared afterwards, with (median matrix) or without (raw matrix) taking into account the size of subpopulations. The most accurate estimation of observed covariance was obtained with the median covariance matrix. The median covariance matrix can be used, in combination with average parameters obtained on-farm, to generate virtual populations of pigs that account for a realistic description of mean performances and their variability.Keywords: pig, growth, modeling, variability, Flury hierarchy ImplicationsMost pig growth models are deterministic and predicted performance and derived nutritional recommendations do not account for variation of performance within a group. Adding stochasticity to these models requires not only knowledge of the variation in model parameters but also the covariance among parameters. This study focused on this covariance and the extent to which this information can be generalized across popula...

Phenotypic and genetic relationships between growth and feed intake curves and feed efficiency and amino acid requirements in the growing pig

“…Mean values for growth and FI model parameters were in agreement with those reported by Brossard et al (2006) in pigs from a three-way cross and by Vautier et al (2013) in LW × Piétrain pigs. To describe growth and FI dynamics, the InraPorc ® software estimates parameters with biological meaning that can be interpreted as production indicators for the growing-finishing period.…”

“…Simultaneous modelling of FI (expressed on an NE basis) and growth was carried out for each pig individually Genetics of pig feed efficiency and growth curves using the InraPorc ® software as described by Vautier et al (2013). The method is based on the concept of inverted modelling (Doeschl-Wilson et al, 2007), in which real data are compared with model outputs and model parameters are adjusted iteratively to minimize the difference between predicted and observed values.…”

“…The BW is finally estimated from the predicted protein and lipid mass. Among the different equations available in InraPorc ® to model FI, the gamma function was retained (Vautier et al, 2013). It describes FI as multiples of the maintenance requirements: a mature animal (with a high BW) eats only for maintenance and has no growth.…”

Life cycle assessment as a tool to evaluate the impact of reducing crude protein in pig diets

“…The first refers to better taking into account between-animal variability during data estimation, mainly in pig production. The heterogeneity that exists among animals even in groups standardized by age and sex is usually not considered, although different studies have been demonstrating this effect (BROSSARD et al, 2009;VAUTIER et al, 2013). The second refers to the possibility of using experimental data of performance and excretion as inputs and outputs in a LCA study.…”

Feed evaluation science

“…Here we give an example application to modelling live weight growth of pigs and chicken (unpublished data), where we have estimated the posterior distribution of the model parameters by fitting the model (12) to data, and subsequently generated a posterior distribution of predicted live weight performance by simulating the model from the data-based parameter distribution. Correlation among model parameters (Vautier et al, 2013) is automatically incorporated in this distribution by using likelihood-free, simulation-based parameter estimation that relies on weaker distributional assumptions (Beaumont, 2010). Figure 7 shows the predicted distributions of live weight of growing male pigs from 60 to 360 days (fitting the model to data from 60 to 180 days), for a selected individual (left) and for a population (right).…”