2019
DOI: 10.1515/opli-2019-0007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accounting for the stochastic nature of sound symbolism using Maximum Entropy model

Abstract: Sound symbolism refers to stochastic and systematic associations between sounds and meanings. Sound symbolism has not received much serious attention in the generative phonology literature, perhaps because most if not all sound symbolic patterns are probabilistic. Building on the recent proposal to analyze sound symbolic patterns within a formal phonological framework (Alderete and Kochetov 2017), this paper shows that MaxEnt grammars allow us to model stochastic sound symbolic patterns in a very natural way. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was therefore expected that Takarazuka players may try to convey their "Takarazuka-gender" through their names. As predicted, Katsuda's analysis found that as shown in Figure 3, the more sonorants are contained in their name, the more likely that these names are used for female roles [14]. This result is a clear case in which the sound symbolic relationship between sonorants and females is playing a crucial role in naming.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It was therefore expected that Takarazuka players may try to convey their "Takarazuka-gender" through their names. As predicted, Katsuda's analysis found that as shown in Figure 3, the more sonorants are contained in their name, the more likely that these names are used for female roles [14]. This result is a clear case in which the sound symbolic relationship between sonorants and females is playing a crucial role in naming.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 59%
“…On the other hand, only 7 out of 643 obstruents (1%) were targeted by reduplication. This difference is statistically significant, and shows that Japanese AKB idols are actively choosing to increase the number of sonorants in their nicknames [14].…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 91%
“…A similar question arises when studying sound symbolism. For instance, some studies report that two instances of the same segment can evoke a stronger image than one instance (Hamano, 2013; Kawahara et al, 2019; Kawahara and Kumagai, to appear; Martin, 1962), which is akin to what Jäger and Rosenbach (2006) refer to as counting cumulativity . Moreover, D'Onofrio (2014) shows that in the bouba ‐ kiki effect, several phonetic/phonological features matter in determining the perceived roundness/angularity of visual images (e.g., vowel backness, voicing, and place of articulation), and that these effects are cumulative, which would remind phonologists of ganging‐up cumulativity (Jäger & Rosenbach, 2006).…”
Section: Common Issues and Shared Interestsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They propose an analysis of expressive palatalization using Optimality Theory (Prince & Smolensky, 2004), with a set of violable constraints (E xpress[x] ) specifying which sounds should be realized to express which meanings. Kawahara, Katsuda, and Kumagai (2019) analyze sound symbolic connections themselves (rather than alternations triggered by sound symbolic considerations), and argue that as long as generative phonology is a function that maps one representation (e.g., underlying forms) to another (e.g., surface forms)—as it in fact has been—there is nothing that prevents us from using the same formalism to model the mapping from representation in one modality (i.e., sound) to representation in another modality (i.e., meaning). In other words, the grammatical device that phonologists have been using for decades can be applied to formalize sound symbolic connections at no additional costs.…”
Section: Phonology and Sound Symbolismmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation