2005
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.824728
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accounting for the Source of Exchange Rate Movements: New Evidence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to this view, permanent real shocks are responsible for fluctuations in both real and nominal rates. To determine the significance of permanent and momentary shocks on exchange rates, it is crucial to construct an empirical model, as emphasized by Farrant and Peersman (2005). This study examines the effects of three distinct shocks, specifically, supply shocks, demand shocks and monetary shocks, on fluctuations in the real exchange rate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to this view, permanent real shocks are responsible for fluctuations in both real and nominal rates. To determine the significance of permanent and momentary shocks on exchange rates, it is crucial to construct an empirical model, as emphasized by Farrant and Peersman (2005). This study examines the effects of three distinct shocks, specifically, supply shocks, demand shocks and monetary shocks, on fluctuations in the real exchange rate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Farrant and Peersman (2005), for instance, use sign restrictions introduced by Faust (1998), Uhlig (1999) and Canova and De Nicoló (2002) instead of long-run zero restrictions. Artis and Ehrmann (2000), Fisher and Huh (2002), and Alexius und Post (2005) use a combination of short and long-run restrictions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%