2015
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.10609
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accounting for soil parameter uncertainty in a physically based and distributed approach for rainfall-triggered landslides

Abstract: In this study we propose a probabilistic approach for coupled distributed hydrological-hillslope stability models that accounts for soil\ud parameters uncertainty at basin scale. The geotechnical and soil retention curve parameters are treated as random variables across the\ud basin and theoretical probability distributions of the Factor of Safety (FS) are estimated. The derived distributions are used to obtain the\ud spatio-temporal dynamics of probability of failure, in terms of parameters uncertainty, condi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
48
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
48
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Designating landslide hazard as a probability, rather than an index, systematically accounts for uncertainty and variability in stability analysis (Hammond et al, 1992;Simoni et al, 2008;Arnone et al, 2014) and more appropriately represents complex systems (Berti et al, 2012). Recently, some promising advances have been made in process-based models accounting for data uncertainty in landslide hazard mapping (e.g., Raia et al, 2014;Arnone et al, 2016a).…”
Section: Geomorphology and Modeling Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Designating landslide hazard as a probability, rather than an index, systematically accounts for uncertainty and variability in stability analysis (Hammond et al, 1992;Simoni et al, 2008;Arnone et al, 2014) and more appropriately represents complex systems (Berti et al, 2012). Recently, some promising advances have been made in process-based models accounting for data uncertainty in landslide hazard mapping (e.g., Raia et al, 2014;Arnone et al, 2016a).…”
Section: Geomorphology and Modeling Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• in other studies (e.g., Abbaszadeh et al, 2011;Arnone et al, 2016a). Other spatial soil and vegetation datasets can be used in the preprocessing of the model.…”
Section: Model Drivermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lack in accuracy of forcing boundary conditions, such as the temporal and areal variability of historical rainfall, introduces further uncertainty that needs to be considered (Minder et al, 2009;von Ruette et al, 2014). Studies have assessed the impact of uncertainties associated with such models Arnone et al, 2016) for both site-specific and spatially distributed landslide hazard predictions -though such information is rarely used to support risk reduction decisionmaking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The slope stability model explicitly accounts for the spatial heterogeneity of factors that control shallow landslides, including mechanical and hydrological soil properties (Arnone et al, , ), local topographic characteristics, and the temporal variation of soil moisture in response to precipitation events, which controls the temporal FS dynamics at the watershed scale (Simoni et al, ; Arnone et al, ; Lepore et al, ; Formetta et al, ). Possible landslide deposition paths are estimated based on the concept of run‐out distance (Bathurst et al, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%