2019 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/icra.2019.8793501
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accounting for Part Pose Estimation Uncertainties during Trajectory Generation for Part Pick-Up Using Mobile Manipulators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite abundant research in trajectory planning for mobile robots and robotic arms, few works focused on coupling both systems' control. It was shown that coupling the base and the robotic arm motion leads to a considerable reduction of total operational time and smoother motions [1], [2]. Nevertheless, these methods were designed for static environments and did not allow real-time collision avoidance.…”
Section: B Collision Avoidance For Mobile Manipulatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite abundant research in trajectory planning for mobile robots and robotic arms, few works focused on coupling both systems' control. It was shown that coupling the base and the robotic arm motion leads to a considerable reduction of total operational time and smoother motions [1], [2]. Nevertheless, these methods were designed for static environments and did not allow real-time collision avoidance.…”
Section: B Collision Avoidance For Mobile Manipulatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Motion for both parts then need to be synchronized or are executed sequentially. Both synchronization and sequencing limit the ability of the robot to perform complex tasks, and it was shown that decoupled and sequenced approaches show significantly higher operational times [1], [2]. Yet, solving the wholebody trajectory optimization problem is challenging due to a large number of degrees of freedom (e.g., 10 for the robot used in our experiments and shown in Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Thakar et al [30] considered the manipulator motion planning problem for a mobile manipulator to pick and transport a target object, where the picking is performed while the base is moving. They considered accounting for the pose estimation of the target object in [31], however, picking from a moving base is still relatively sensitive to the base position uncertainty and is not robust in real world implementation. Moreover, for multiple pick-and-place tasks considered in this paper, the mobile manipulator is expected to pick up multiple objects stored within a small region, it is very difficult for the mobile manipulator to finish the task within a short period of time, in this sense, picking while moving is not practical.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finishing (Bhatt et al, 2019; Kabir et al, 2016, 2018c), painting (Chen et al, 2016), inspection (Yau and Menq, 1995), fiber placement (Malhan et al, 2019a,b, 2018, 2020; Shembekar et al, 2018; Shirinzadeh et al, 2007), sheet forming and handling (Li and Ceglarek, 2002), transportation (Colombo et al, 2019; Kabir et al, 2020; Thakar et al, 2018, 2019a, 2020a,b), grasping (Kumbla et al, 2017, 2018; Thakar et al, 2019b), wire harnessing (Hermansson et al, 2013; Shah and Shah, 2016), machine tending (Al-Hussaini et al, 2020; Annem et al, 2019), and 3D printing (Bhatt et al, 2018) are some of the operations where relative motion of objects can be encoded as path constraints. These path constraints or the motion of the objects can be generated using traditional motion planners (Elber and Cohen, 1994; Kuffner and LaValle, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%