2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0168-9002(02)02080-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accounting for incomplete charge collection in Monte Carlo simulations of the efficiency of well-type Ge-detectors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The comparison between the calculated values of efficiencies and experimental ones provided in these papers shows that the error is very small. This method proves its accuracy and success for many detector geometries; like: coaxial detectors [1][2][3][4], parallelepiped detectors [5] and borehole detectors [12]; and types like: semiconductors [4][5][6][7] and scintillators [1][2][3] Besides, the direct mathematical method is built on simple mathematical approach and it does not need long computer programs nor previous experimental calculation of the efficiency of standard source like other Monte Carlo method [13][14][15][16]. In this work we used direct mathematical method to predict the efficiency of two well type detectors, in detecting the gamma photons produced by sources placed in their well cavities, over wide range of photon energy for seven different source geometries and positions including point sources with very small dimensions and cylindrical sources.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The comparison between the calculated values of efficiencies and experimental ones provided in these papers shows that the error is very small. This method proves its accuracy and success for many detector geometries; like: coaxial detectors [1][2][3][4], parallelepiped detectors [5] and borehole detectors [12]; and types like: semiconductors [4][5][6][7] and scintillators [1][2][3] Besides, the direct mathematical method is built on simple mathematical approach and it does not need long computer programs nor previous experimental calculation of the efficiency of standard source like other Monte Carlo method [13][14][15][16]. In this work we used direct mathematical method to predict the efficiency of two well type detectors, in detecting the gamma photons produced by sources placed in their well cavities, over wide range of photon energy for seven different source geometries and positions including point sources with very small dimensions and cylindrical sources.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Work has been done by Hernandez and El-Daoushy [31] and Friedman et al [25] in order to calculate the electrical field and its variation over the crystal. They propose that regions in the detector with reduced electrical field, and correspondingly longer collection times, will have only partial charge collection and hence will not contribute to the full energy peak.…”
Section: Influence Of the Electrical Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though the electrical field is generally considered to be fairly independent of the bias voltage above the depletion level, there is a slight increase with increasing bias voltage [40]. If the reduced sensitivity of this detector is due to effects of the electrical field in the way described by Hernandez and El-Daoushy [31] and Friedman et al [25], significantly reducing the bias voltage should affect the detection efficiency.…”
Section: Influence Of the Electrical Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The calculation of absolute activities of natural and artificial radionuclides by gamma spectrometry requires reliable and accurate determination of the detector full-energy peak efficiency [1]. The main problem of the measurements in the well-type detector geometry is the presence of high coincidence summing effects in the case of multi-photonemitting radionuclides.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%