2018
DOI: 10.20944/preprints201803.0026.v1
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accounting for Field-Scale Dry Deposition in Backward Lagrangian Stochastic Dispersion Modelling of NH<sub>3</sub> Emissions

Abstract: A controlled ammonia (NH3) release experiment was performed at a grassland site to quantify the effect of dry deposition, at the field scale between the source and the receptors (NH3 measurement locations), on the estimates of emission rates by means of inverse dispersion modelling. NH3 was released for 3 hours at a constant rate of Q = 6.29 mg s&minus;1 from a grid of 36 orifices spread over an area of 250 m2. The increase in line-integrated NH3 concentration was measured with open-path optical miniDOAS d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(37 reference statements)
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2.7), and the footprint has to be checked for the spatial dimension to be sure that the measured flux is mainly dominated by the area of the system and not contaminated by the neighboring systems (either the other grazing system or fluxes originating from surrounding fields). In this study an open-source version of a backward Lagrangian stochastic dispersion footprint model (bLS) was used (Häni, 2017;Häni et al, 2018), based on Flesch et al (2004). The flux-to-emission ratio is calculated following Eq.…”
Section: Footprint Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2.7), and the footprint has to be checked for the spatial dimension to be sure that the measured flux is mainly dominated by the area of the system and not contaminated by the neighboring systems (either the other grazing system or fluxes originating from surrounding fields). In this study an open-source version of a backward Lagrangian stochastic dispersion footprint model (bLS) was used (Häni, 2017;Häni et al, 2018), based on Flesch et al (2004). The flux-to-emission ratio is calculated following Eq.…”
Section: Footprint Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2.7), and the footprint has to be checked for the spatial dimension to be sure that the measured flux is mainly dominated by the area of the system and not contaminated by the neighboring systems (either the other grazing system or fluxes originating from surrounding fields). In this study an open-source version of a backward Lagrangian stochastic dispersion footprint model (bLS) was used (Häni, 2017;Häni et al, 2018), based on Flesch et al (2004). The flux-to-emission ratio is calculated following Eq.…”
Section: Footprint Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bLS dispersion modelling is a well-defined approach and was evaluated extensively by Flesch et al (2005), Harper et al (2010 and McGinn et al (2009), who found that the model uncertainty is typically of the order of 20 %. Combining the 20 % uncertainty for the bLS modelling and the 17 % measurement-related uncertainty results in a total mean systemic uncertainty of 26 %.…”
Section: Effect Of Different Error Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%