Accounting for Changing Tastes: Approaches to Explaining Unstable Individual Preferences

Abstract

Standard economic theory assumes individual preferences to be fixed and exogenously given. This view has been challenged by numerous empirical observations. In reaction to those challenges, economic theory has been modified, mostly by including additional arguments into individuals' utility functions. Among the approaches that tackle preference change are new consumer theory, habit formation, interdependent and status preferences, social and emotional influences, and reference point-dependent preferences. Hence, while standard economics largely abide by their assumption of stable preferences, an array of alternative approaches is now available to account for changing tastes. Some of these approaches are old and have been discussed in the literature for many decades while others are younger. However, all approaches have in common that they, in some cases surprisingly, have not made it to standard microeconomics textbooks. This survey aims at putting the approaches in perspective. For each of them, empirical evidence as well as methodological issues are discussed.

The dynamics of behavior in modified dictator games

“…that people make identical decisions in identical repetitions of the decision task. If behavior varies with repetition, these variations are usually attributed to strategic considerations such as reputation building or to some form of learning from information feedback (for an overview, see [ 12 ]). But what do the dynamics of social behavior look like if these considerations are excluded?…”

Can Economics Help to Understand, and Change, Consumption Behaviour?

“…Note: Friedman (1953) pointed out that "unrealistic assumptions in models are not per se problematic. The quality of a model should be judged from the exactness of its predictions concerning the purpose of its creation rather than from the reality of its assumptions" (Jacobs, 2016). 6.…”

Trade-offs during the COVID-19 pandemic: A discrete choice experiment about policy preferences in Portugal

“…3 -Information on University Education was provided as an aggregate measure. 4 -Level 7 and 8 (ISCED). 5 -Non-Available Information.…”

“…Understanding individuals' preferences in this context is extremely important as the efficacy of contingency measures depended heavily on individuals' behaviours. Literature has shown that it is challenging to capture these preferences [3,4]. To overcome this, researchers have been increasingly using Discrete Choice Experiments (DCE) to understand preferences and inform policy decisions, which is especially relevant in healthcare studies [5].…”