2012 IEEE International Systems Conference SysCon 2012 2012
DOI: 10.1109/syscon.2012.6189520
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accounting for “mission” during co-optimization of system designs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(5 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where Pgout, k is the active power output of GTG k; pfk is the power factor of GTG k; uk is the online status (0=offline, 1=online) of GTG k; and vk is the power factor status (0=lagging, 1=leading) of GTG k. fEDP is the function calcuating the minimum fuel consumption [8], and QOS is the QOS metric in (1).…”
Section: B Simulation Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…where Pgout, k is the active power output of GTG k; pfk is the power factor of GTG k; uk is the online status (0=offline, 1=online) of GTG k; and vk is the power factor status (0=lagging, 1=leading) of GTG k. fEDP is the function calcuating the minimum fuel consumption [8], and QOS is the QOS metric in (1).…”
Section: B Simulation Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where w is the inertia weight of PSO to calculate velocities of particles at each iteration [8]. We also adopt a dynamic value of w, changing from w max to w min based on the number of iterations, to improve the searching performance.…”
Section: A Methods For Handling Discrete Binary Variables In Sopsomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations