2000
DOI: 10.1006/mare.2000.0132
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accounting change in Dutch government: Exploring the gap between expectations and realizations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
44
0
3

Year Published

2000
2000
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 133 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
44
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Macro view on the stages of the diffusion process based on neo-institutional sociology, analyzing ideas, discourses, and techniques as ascendants of internalization Sharma et al (2010) Dynamic perspective on changes and introduction of major stakeholders in the change process ter Bogt and van Helden (2000):…”
Section: Journal Of Public Administration and Governancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Macro view on the stages of the diffusion process based on neo-institutional sociology, analyzing ideas, discourses, and techniques as ascendants of internalization Sharma et al (2010) Dynamic perspective on changes and introduction of major stakeholders in the change process ter Bogt and van Helden (2000):…”
Section: Journal Of Public Administration and Governancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of Burns and Scapens (2000) analyzes accounting change as a dynamic process (ter Bogt & van Helden, 2000). This also applies to the framework of Sharma et al (2010), which enables a dynamic representation of the institutionalization process.…”
Section: Journal Of Public Administration and Governancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Examples of sophisticated techniques that have received much attention recently are activity-based costing (Kaplan and Cooper, 1998), the balanced scorecard (Kaplan and Norton, 1996), and shareholder value (Rappaport, 1998). Unfortunately, researchers who study the introduction of these and other sophisticated accounting techniques often find that success is not always guaranteed (Shields, 1995;Player and Keys, 1995a, 1995b, 1995cter Bogt and van Helden, 2000). In explaining the lack of success, these researchers focus primarily on implementation-related factors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%