2012
DOI: 10.4324/9780203120149
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accountability in Crises and Public Trust in Governing Institutions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2012 ). One encouraging exception to this trend, however, is a small but growing body of literature focusing on trust as a lens for examining the way human relations influence and are influenced by health system functioning in LMIC ( Goudge and Gilson 2005 ; Svedin 2012 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2012 ). One encouraging exception to this trend, however, is a small but growing body of literature focusing on trust as a lens for examining the way human relations influence and are influenced by health system functioning in LMIC ( Goudge and Gilson 2005 ; Svedin 2012 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis is a plausibility probe aimed at facilitating a discussion about the theoretically informed propositions (George & Bennett ; Ragin ). Sweden was selected because although there are a high number of accountability mechanisms and venues available as well as open access to public information (Svedin , 1), crisis accountability and ministerial resignations is an understudied phenomenon in the country. Sweden has a tradition of long‐serving single‐party socialist government and short‐term complex coalition governments, which should reflect differences in dealing with crisis induced resignations, both between single‐party and multiparty governments as well as within similar types of government over time.…”
Section: Methods and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…; Svedin, , 14) is, according to ‘t Hart (), a potentially delegitimising situation, with critiques requiring responses and triggering defensive routines on behalf of the leaders. Three sources were used to identify 44 crisis events that triggered accountability pressures on a national level: Svedin (); the 2014 case list by CRISMART (http://www.crismart.org); and crises documented by the Swedish Emergency Management Agency, SEMA (http://www.msb.se). The presence of high accountability pressures identified in media and prior research rather than the type of crisis constitute the basis for selection.…”
Section: Methods and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Crises represent a complex policy problem which often requires agencies to work outside norms. Crisis management has often been seen as a unique area of public policy where the public retains a high degree of expectation that governments will respond to crisis in a timely and efficient manner (Svedin ). Under these situations leaders are required to manage emergency responses and situations without full operational knowledge (Boin et al.…”
Section: Crisis and Disaster Management: When The Unexpected Happensmentioning
confidence: 99%