2011
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511873706
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Account of the Kingdom of Caubul, and its Dependencies in Persia, Tartary, and India

Abstract: Face of the counhy.--Currapa pas-Nu1nbers.-Government.-Employment of the population . . 40 Face of the count1y.-Divisions and numbers of the Khyberees.-Khyber pass.-Pensions for securingit.-Depredations,-Appearance, manners, and character . 42 TRIBES O F PBSHAWER. Face of the country.-Divisions and numbers.-History of the Glioreeakhai1.-Dependence 011 the King.-Internal government, dress, manners, and character . . 45 KHUTTUKS. Numbers.-Face of the country.-Plains on the north.-Divisions and numbers.-Govemmeii… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, in relation to the Sindh, Richard Burton wrote in 1849: "most villages could be razed to the ground, transported to the requisite distance, and re-erected in a week, at an expense of probably a couple of rupees per house" [43]. Few years earlier, in 1842, Mountstuart Elphinstone wrote in relation to the Indus river: "the labourers have temporary huts erected, and cultivated" and "and the villages are only temporary, with a few exceptions" [61]. Mobile strategies have been proposed for the interpretation of prehistoric settlement patterns related to irregular water availability in semi-arid areas of Western India [22,60,62].…”
Section: Historical Social Responses To River Morphodynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in relation to the Sindh, Richard Burton wrote in 1849: "most villages could be razed to the ground, transported to the requisite distance, and re-erected in a week, at an expense of probably a couple of rupees per house" [43]. Few years earlier, in 1842, Mountstuart Elphinstone wrote in relation to the Indus river: "the labourers have temporary huts erected, and cultivated" and "and the villages are only temporary, with a few exceptions" [61]. Mobile strategies have been proposed for the interpretation of prehistoric settlement patterns related to irregular water availability in semi-arid areas of Western India [22,60,62].…”
Section: Historical Social Responses To River Morphodynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rather, in the eyes of the British, Afghanistan's civi-territorial complex (Connolly, 1996) was only a loose construct, dominated by the 'settled' communities, and obscured by a heterogeneous collective of tribes with varying allegiance to Kabul. To the British, Afghanistan lacked a single sovereign authority, was divided into semi-sovereign 'tribal republics' (Elphinstone, 1842), and lacked an agreed-upon territorial limit.…”
Section: Ontological (In)security and Empirementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 1802 the Iranians were in Mashhad again where they consolidated their hold and three years later they attacked Herat. Internal troubles in Afghanistan prevented aid from reaching the Afghan governor there, and after a Iranian victory at Ghurian, he ceded that border fortress to Iran and agreed to pay tribute for Heart (Elphinstone, 1815;Watson, 1866). Iranians was prevented from following up this success however, because war had broken out with Russia.…”
Section: Fath Ali Shah In Challenging With European'smentioning
confidence: 99%