Abstract:As a field, sociocultural linguistics has a long legacy of public scholarship that has worked to counter linguistic prejudices and inequalities perpetuated through language. Today, current community engagement within sociocultural linguistics increasingly takes a collaborative approach that includes students. In this article, I therefore explore how the field prepares both students and faculty for this work. In particular, I focus on courses with a service learning component, suggesting that these constitute k… Show more
“…Importantly, conducting community‐engaged action research (Arnold, 2019) is also part of a growing trend to organize critical service‐learning programs (Leeman et al., 2011) and introduce social justice into language teacher education curricula (Avineri et al., 2019). We highlight two noteworthy recent community‐engaged studies in applied linguistics next.…”
Consistent with recent calls to bridge the research–practice divide in second language acquisition, this article reports on the findings of a collaborative autoethnographic study that we, authors of this article, conducted as critical second language teacher educators. Conducting a series of constructive dialogues among ourselves for a semester, we focused on how our acts of reciprocal reflexivity were characterized by discussions and subsequent actions with our teacher partners located in different parts of the world and working in diverse contexts. Our data, which included reflective journal entries, phenomenological interviews, artefacts, and audio‐recorded group conversations, illustrate how we fostered constructive researcher–practitioner collaborations. These collaborations were mediated within and outside our classroom settings, as we sought to ultimately improve our own pedagogical practices. In contrast to working from an ivory tower and in keeping with our commitment to promoting equitable educational and research practices, our article also demonstrates and problematizes how we conducted our research in an ethical manner when designing, carrying out, and subsequently disseminating our findings to multiple audiences.
“…Importantly, conducting community‐engaged action research (Arnold, 2019) is also part of a growing trend to organize critical service‐learning programs (Leeman et al., 2011) and introduce social justice into language teacher education curricula (Avineri et al., 2019). We highlight two noteworthy recent community‐engaged studies in applied linguistics next.…”
Consistent with recent calls to bridge the research–practice divide in second language acquisition, this article reports on the findings of a collaborative autoethnographic study that we, authors of this article, conducted as critical second language teacher educators. Conducting a series of constructive dialogues among ourselves for a semester, we focused on how our acts of reciprocal reflexivity were characterized by discussions and subsequent actions with our teacher partners located in different parts of the world and working in diverse contexts. Our data, which included reflective journal entries, phenomenological interviews, artefacts, and audio‐recorded group conversations, illustrate how we fostered constructive researcher–practitioner collaborations. These collaborations were mediated within and outside our classroom settings, as we sought to ultimately improve our own pedagogical practices. In contrast to working from an ivory tower and in keeping with our commitment to promoting equitable educational and research practices, our article also demonstrates and problematizes how we conducted our research in an ethical manner when designing, carrying out, and subsequently disseminating our findings to multiple audiences.
“…They may call themselves an "ally" but ignore structural inequities (Smith & Mayorga-Gallo, 2017), which privilege White ideologies. Moving beyond allyship toward accompliceship means accepting one's complicitness in inequitable systems (Arnold, 2019), which requires deep, difficult intrapersonal work. Racial and social justice educator DiAngelo's (2018a) White Fragility guides readers in the discomfort of questioning their roles within a system of White supremacy.…”
Section: Level 4: Symbolic Actionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Answers like yes, but it is challenging mean educators see diversity not as a liability (Smith & Mayorga‐Gallo, 2017) but as different groups acting as equal partners in building equity through embracing cognitive dissonance at the expense of perceived harmony. Listening responsibly, having urgency for action, acting together, and leveraging one’s privileges strategically with marginalized groups in accountable ways increases inclusivity (Arnold, 2019), but facilitating open discussion on race can be tricky. Educators Sensoy and DiAngelo’s (2017) Is Everyone Really Equal?…”
Section: Reflecting On Levels Of Critical Consciousnessmentioning
Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages (TESOL) professionals are immersed in multilingual and multicultural spaces. Thus, many consider TESOL educators innately culturally competent, yet others argue this is not the case (e.g., Lin et al., 2004). Moving the TESOL field from liberal to critical forms of multiculturalism (Kubota & Lin, 2006) requires consideration of power and privilege with increased critical consciousness (Freire, 1973). Using critical approaches through a racial lens, the authors examine the concepts of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) for professional development and fostering a culture of social justice, where TESOL professionals recognize the ongoing reflexive work necessary to embrace diversity in all its forms. To determine educators’ level of critical consciousness, the authors propose using the Glasgow Group’s (2017) levels of inclusive school communities as a framework for locating educators along a continuum of critical consciousness. They guide readers through the six levels, providing self‐reflection questions, and recommending critical consciousness‐raising resources.
“…Ethnographers working with illegalized im/migrant communities have called on colleagues to reject apolitical research agendas, and facile helping roles and instead become accomplices who are willing to risk privilege and participate actively in collaborative, egalitarian struggles against oppression (Arnold 2019;Gomberg-Muñoz 2018; see also Indigenous Action 2014). They enjoin researchers to enact complicity, moving beyond mere amity and to reject the widely-heralded stance of allyship, which they associate with white innocence and with fleeting, self-centering forms of support.…”
Immigrant rights activism in rural Western New York involves collaboration between im/migrant farmworkers and their non-immigrant supporters, aliados (allies). Ally ride-giving in particular plays a crucial role in mobilization. Because allyship is a cornerstone of contemporary US social movements and a role to which ethnographers are likely to be assigned when working in activist settings, I approach the constructs of allyship and rides as objects of critical inquiry and in relation to conversations about complicity in ethnographic practice. Using experiences from my fieldwork as an aliada (ally) and volunteer raitera (driver), I unpack how rides become more than a mechanical means to a transportation end. When racialization and illegality constrain people's use of roads and cars, I posit that rides can constitute a collaborative means of resistance and an intervention in the politics of mobility. For engaged scholars, this political aspect of rides should not be divorced from considerations of rides as an intimate space-time shared between drivers and passengers and that exceeds their instrumentalization as a political tool. This theorization of rides as simultaneously political and intimate is generative in imagining modes of praxis for ethnographers acting as accomplices in shared struggles for justice.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.