2020
DOI: 10.1007/jhep11(2020)074
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accidental SO(10) axion from gauged flavour

Abstract: An accidental U(1) Peccei-Quinn (PQ) symmetry automatically arises in a class of SO(10) unified theories upon gauging the SU(3)f flavour group. The PQ symmetry is protected by the ℤ4 × ℤ3 center of SO(10) × SU(3)f up to effective operators of canonical dimension six. However, high-scale contributions to the axion potential posing a PQ quality problem arise only at d = 9. In the pre-inflationary PQ breaking scenario the axion mass window is predicted to be ma ∈ [7 × 10−8, 10−3] eV, where the lower end is bounde… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[12][13][14][15][16][17] that this U(1)-violating effect is generically too large to solve the strong CP problem due to the high sensitivity of the Peccei-Quinn mechanism to the U(1)-breaking effectthis is dubbed as the axion quality problem. This observation stimulated a variety of works to construct axion models that evade the quality problem, such as those utilizing additional gauge symmetries [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36], heavy axion models [37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50], composite axion models [51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59], and so on …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[12][13][14][15][16][17] that this U(1)-violating effect is generically too large to solve the strong CP problem due to the high sensitivity of the Peccei-Quinn mechanism to the U(1)-breaking effectthis is dubbed as the axion quality problem. This observation stimulated a variety of works to construct axion models that evade the quality problem, such as those utilizing additional gauge symmetries [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36], heavy axion models [37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50], composite axion models [51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59], and so on …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…UV sources of PQ breaking can be avoided in some invisible axion constructions within a variety of extra assumptions or frameworks[66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78], or be arguably negligible under certain conditions[79].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The grand unification theories (GUT) were considered as framework for the axion models based on the SU(5) [9] and SO (10) [10] unifications. Later, other varieties based on the SU (5) [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20], SO (10) [18,[21][22][23][24][25][26], and E 6 [27] were also studied. In most of the previous SU (5) and SO (10) GUT model buildings, the global U(1) PQ symmetry commutes with the GUT group.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This leads to the PQ quality problem [11,[28][29][30][31][32], where the global U(1) PQ symmetry should be a good symmetry at sufficiently high scale. It is therefore desirable to have the PQ symmetry arise automatically, and this was discussed in the context of various GUTs [11,26], as well as models with extended gauge symmetries [33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation