2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2008.12.1125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accidental allergic reactions in children allergic to cow's milk proteins

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
77
1
5

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
77
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…5,20,22 In a 1-year retrospective study of 3 year olds with milk allergy (n = 88) in Spain, 40% had 53 reactions, 22 compared with 42.2% over the period of our study. In a retrospective study of 252 Canadian children (mean age 8.1 years) with peanut allergy, an annual rate of 14.3% was observed, 20 compared with 6% in our group.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 62%
“…5,20,22 In a 1-year retrospective study of 3 year olds with milk allergy (n = 88) in Spain, 40% had 53 reactions, 22 compared with 42.2% over the period of our study. In a retrospective study of 252 Canadian children (mean age 8.1 years) with peanut allergy, an annual rate of 14.3% was observed, 20 compared with 6% in our group.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 62%
“…Thirty-five children developed allergic reactions, and 15% presented with severe symptoms. The risk of presenting with severe symptoms was associated with a high concentration of asIgE and asthma [45].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 In a study in 88 children with milk allergy (median age: 32.5 months) followed for 1 year, 53% of reported reactions were mild (defined as cutaneous symptoms [angioedema excluded], rhinitis, or conjunctivitis). 21 A recent Canadian study of accidental exposures to peanut in 1941 children (mean age: 7 years) with confirmed peanut allergy reported that 30% of exposures resulted only in mild symptoms (defined as involving only pruritus, urticaria, flushing, or rhinoconjunctivitis). 22 Therefore, in the event of a mild allergic reaction involving isolated skin symptoms, mild facial or oral symptoms, or mild gastrointestinal tract discomfort, none of which meet the criteria for anaphylaxis, the use of oral antihistamines may be an option.…”
Section: Treatment Pathwaysmentioning
confidence: 99%