SAE Technical Paper Series 2006
DOI: 10.4271/2006-01-0899
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accident Reconstruction for Rear Pole Impacts of Passenger Cars

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During a collision with a narrow obstacle, longitudinals, which should primarily absorb the energy during the collision, are not hit, as stated by Struble [ 31 ] The results confirmed that the number of measurement points should be chosen with respect to the deformation characteristics as described by, e.g. Nordhagen et al [ 27 ], but the use of measurement points could not be evaluated validly since the CRASH3 algorithm is generally less suitable for calculating EES after a collision with a narrow obstacle [ 16 , 18 , 36 , 37 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…During a collision with a narrow obstacle, longitudinals, which should primarily absorb the energy during the collision, are not hit, as stated by Struble [ 31 ] The results confirmed that the number of measurement points should be chosen with respect to the deformation characteristics as described by, e.g. Nordhagen et al [ 27 ], but the use of measurement points could not be evaluated validly since the CRASH3 algorithm is generally less suitable for calculating EES after a collision with a narrow obstacle [ 16 , 18 , 36 , 37 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…So even though the variation of the b 0 value did not result in significant differences in the EES value, use of the b 0 value should respect the vehicle stiffness considering class, technological obsolescence, or degree of corrosion. These factors were defined as influencing vehicle stiffness including b 0 also by [ 2 , 20 , 26 , 27 , 33 ], but not based on statistical analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations