Although the Euopean Employment Strategy (EES) has applied to the new Member States only after accession, it had shaped the Czech employment policy already well before that date. Therefore, the question arises, how the EES could gain such influence, despite the fact that the EES represents neither a very strong kind of EU regulation nor was pushed by the European Commission in course of its pre-accession strategy. Europeanisation theory suggests that basically institutional misfit between EU and national regulation as well as certain national conditions may explain the adaptation of national policies to EU norms.
However, as the EES represents a very soft type of EU regulation, the cognitive influence on dominant national actors plays an important role for its impact. In the Czech case, the EU has been quite successful in influencing the agenda setting for the employment -the interpretation of labour market problems was shaped by the aims of the EES and led to an activation and streamlining of the employment policy. However, it was less the official employment policy review as part of the pre-accssion strategy than the model function of the EES that was decesive for successful and early adaptation.Key words: European Employment Strategy, Czech Republic, adaptation, EU accession.* An earlier version of this article was presented at the ESPAnet Conference 2005., September [22][23][24] 2005., University of Fribourg, Switzerland. I am grateful to Siniša Zrinščak and two anonymous reviewers for useful comments that helped much for revising the paper. ** Ana Schüttpelz, Centrum für Globalisierung und Governance Department für Wirtschafts und Sozialwissenschaften/Universität Hamburg, Allende-Platz 1, 20 146 Hamburg/Germany, schuettpelz@soziallwiss. uni-hamburg.de 152 Rev. soc. polit., god. 13, br. 1, str 151-171, Zagreb 2006. Schüttpelz A.: The Europeanisation of Employment Policy... Single Market. In the mid-1990s, however, two factors strengthened the demand for developing the social dimension of the integration project. On the one hand, it became obvious that the common, structural nature of the unemployment problems in the EU could not be adequately dealt with by simply promoting economic growth (as was still hoped in the 1988. Cecchini Reports).On the other hand, the monetary stabilisation policy pursued in the run-up to the Economic and Monetary Union (EMU) called for a more co-ordinated, employment-oriented policy response at the European level (see also Commission, 2002.). Following a functionalist approach to European integration it can be argued, that the EU's lack of competence and capacity for social policy became an obstacle to its economic activities. However, the question remains: How has the EES changed European employment policies? During the last decade, Europeanisation research has developed as a new field within the study of European integration. The concept of Europeanisation has been used for answering the question of how European policies, norms and rules affect domestic structures and polici...