Proceedings of the ACL 2005 on Interactive Poster and Demonstration Sessions - ACL '05 2005
DOI: 10.3115/1225753.1225755
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accessing GermaNet data and computing semantic relatedness

Abstract: We present an API developed to access GermaNet, a lexical semantic database for German represented in XML. The API provides a set of software functions for parsing and retrieving information from GermaNet. Then, we present a case study which builds upon the GermaNet API and implements an application for computing semantic relatedness according to five different metrics. The package can, again, serve as a software library to be deployed in natural language processing applications. A graphical user interface all… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(7 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In practice, although the performance of different methods for different languages are generally consistent, some may require specialization due to different characteristics (e.g., morphological, syntactical) of languages. For example, Gurevych and Niederlich (2005) showed that for strongly inflected languages such as German, methods that require counting word frequencies such as IC-based methods can be biased, and it is necessary to apply stemming or lemmatization to reduce inflected words to certain base forms to obtain more accurate predictions. Such insights can be valuable references but they are currently rare due to lack of literature on multilingual semantic relatedness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In practice, although the performance of different methods for different languages are generally consistent, some may require specialization due to different characteristics (e.g., morphological, syntactical) of languages. For example, Gurevych and Niederlich (2005) showed that for strongly inflected languages such as German, methods that require counting word frequencies such as IC-based methods can be biased, and it is necessary to apply stemming or lemmatization to reduce inflected words to certain base forms to obtain more accurate predictions. Such insights can be valuable references but they are currently rare due to lack of literature on multilingual semantic relatedness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A few recent studies have explored this direction. Gurevych and Niederlich (2005) adapted the methods by Resnik (1995), Jiang and Conrath (1997), and Lin (1998b) to a German lexical knowledge base and tested them on a German dataset. Zesch et al .…”
Section: Methods Of Lexical Semantic Relatednessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To cluster tweets by hashtags, we rely on K-means as a classic hard clustering approach. Similarity was computed as semantic relatedness according to GermaNet [33], similar methods exist for other data and languages [34]. However, for some small datasets no meaningful clustering of the data can be obtained.…”
Section: B Clusteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The linearization of the resulting tree (or graph) is done with a trigram language model. To adapt this system to German, we use the Ger-maNet API (Gurevych & Niederlich, 2005) instead of WordNet. We do not use a paraphrase lexicon, because there is no comparable corpus of sufficient size available for German.…”
Section: Baselinementioning
confidence: 99%