2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access Proceedings
DOI: 10.18260/1-2--36638
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accessing Engineering Standards: A Study in ARL Best Practices for Acquiring and Disseminating Standards

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
4
0

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
(6 reference statements)
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most libraries in this study subscribe to standards directly through SDOs, whereas ondemand access is mainly through aggregators such as Techstreet, IHS, and ANSI Webstore. Similar scenarios are reported by Schlembach (2001), Taylor (1999), andWetzel et al (2021). As in those same studies, libraries continue to provide access to standards through one-time on-demand purchasing due to increasing cost as seen in this study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Most libraries in this study subscribe to standards directly through SDOs, whereas ondemand access is mainly through aggregators such as Techstreet, IHS, and ANSI Webstore. Similar scenarios are reported by Schlembach (2001), Taylor (1999), andWetzel et al (2021). As in those same studies, libraries continue to provide access to standards through one-time on-demand purchasing due to increasing cost as seen in this study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The findings of this study confirm some issues raised in previous studies but also add some new perspectives. It confirms that acquisition of standards is paramount for engineering libraries as documented in the literature (Phillips, 2019;Schlembach, 2001;Taylor, 1999;Wetzel et al, 2021). This study introduces a significant level of granularity in contrast to previous studies, such as student enrollment and highest degree awarded.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 3 more Smart Citations