2022
DOI: 10.3233/idt-210214
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accessing electronic health records in critical incidents using context-aware attribute-based access control

Abstract: In emergency situations, different actors involved in first aid services should be authorized to retrieve information from the patient’s Electronic Health Records (EHRs). The research objectives of this work involve the development and implementation of methods to characterise emergency situations requiring extraordinary access to healthcare data. The aim is to implement such methods based on contextual information pertaining to specific patients and emergency situations and also leveraging personalisation asp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, for the health metrics of SBP current = 123 mmHg, DBP current = 72 mmHg and HR current = 94 bpm, as presented in the current values of the patient with ID 17, shown in Figure 3, we deduce the following respective criticalities of: (i) criticality (SBP current = 123 mmHg) = 33%, (ii) criticality(DBP current = 72 mmHg) = 38.61% and (iii) criticality(HR current = 94 bpm) = 63.6%. In this particular example, neither case is critical, because, as stated in our work [7], for a case to be critical, it should meet the maximum criticality percentage, which is 67% according to the specific fuzzy inferencing process. Therefore, after having calculated if the current case is critical or not, we proceed to the calculation of the criticality for next two hours.…”
Section: Predicting Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…For example, for the health metrics of SBP current = 123 mmHg, DBP current = 72 mmHg and HR current = 94 bpm, as presented in the current values of the patient with ID 17, shown in Figure 3, we deduce the following respective criticalities of: (i) criticality (SBP current = 123 mmHg) = 33%, (ii) criticality(DBP current = 72 mmHg) = 38.61% and (iii) criticality(HR current = 94 bpm) = 63.6%. In this particular example, neither case is critical, because, as stated in our work [7], for a case to be critical, it should meet the maximum criticality percentage, which is 67% according to the specific fuzzy inferencing process. Therefore, after having calculated if the current case is critical or not, we proceed to the calculation of the criticality for next two hours.…”
Section: Predicting Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…In this study, we extend our previous work on context-aware access policies [7] by considering, apart from the patient's current health situation, the prognosis of the patient's future health status. The proposed methodology delivers an access control mechanism which relies on Attribute-based Access Control (ABAC).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations