2005
DOI: 10.3402/rlt.v13i2.10990
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accessing and engaging with video streams for educational purposes: experiences, issues and concerns

Abstract: Video streaming has the potential to offer tutors a more flexible and accessible means of incorporating moving images into learning resources for their students than conventional video. Consideration is given to this assertion by drawing upon the experiences of staff and evidence from students at the University of Southampton in the use of a video, Back Care for Health Professionals, before and after it was streamed. The resulting case study highlights various issues and concerns, both logistical and pedagogic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
(2 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the motivating strategies involve different levels of engaging (Ryan & Deci, 2000;Moller, Ryan & Deci, 2006), engagement can be viewed as a promising indicator to represent student learning process and outcome. Previous studies in video-assisted instructions have documented the difficulties and struggles to evaluate specific use of video in real sense (Bracher, Collier, Ottewill, & Shephard, 2005;Shephard, 2003). Due to the complexity involved in real educational settings and the nature of learning, it is not easy to precisely define any learning outcome to be affected by single media (Sung & Mayer, 2012), let alone most videos were used in the context of blended learning (Garrison, 2001;Palmer, 2007;Shephard, 2003).…”
Section: Students' Learning Engagement Of Instructional Activity In Engineering Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the motivating strategies involve different levels of engaging (Ryan & Deci, 2000;Moller, Ryan & Deci, 2006), engagement can be viewed as a promising indicator to represent student learning process and outcome. Previous studies in video-assisted instructions have documented the difficulties and struggles to evaluate specific use of video in real sense (Bracher, Collier, Ottewill, & Shephard, 2005;Shephard, 2003). Due to the complexity involved in real educational settings and the nature of learning, it is not easy to precisely define any learning outcome to be affected by single media (Sung & Mayer, 2012), let alone most videos were used in the context of blended learning (Garrison, 2001;Palmer, 2007;Shephard, 2003).…”
Section: Students' Learning Engagement Of Instructional Activity In Engineering Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Video technology also has the potential to improve opportunities for students to benefit from feedback that is essential for learning: students' learning process (Orsmond & Merry, 2011), high-quality feedback for student achievement (Brown & Knight, 2012;Hattie & Timperley, 2007), increased level of engagement, and detailed explanation to students through video feedback incorporated into teaching and learning in higher education in recent times (Abdous & Yoshimura, 2010;Abrahamson, 2010;Bracher et al, 2005;Cann, 2007;Michael & Michael, 2015;West & Turner, 2016). A further advantage is that, like audio, video files provide a permanent record, which can be stored online and replayed at the students' convenience, as opposed to handwritten feedback forms which can be lost or damaged.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%