2019 29th International Conference Radioelektronika (RADIOELEKTRONIKA) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/radioelek.2019.8733482
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accessible Electroencephalograms (EEGs): A Comparative Review with OpenBCI’s Ultracortex Mark IV Headset

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To reduce the line noise artefact, we estimated the mains noise component in long segments of data and subtracted the same [32] before re-computing the PSD (see Methods for details), which yielded similar PSDs using both amplifiers (Fig 1B). The slopes of the PSDs computed at two different frequency ranges (16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34) Hz and 54-88 Hz as per our previous report [13]) were not significantly different between OpenBCI Visually similar results were obtained in the baseline-subtracted time frequency spectra of OpenBCI (first column) and Brain Products (second column). The change in power from baseline during stimulus at each frequency (Figure 3, third column), and the change in mean band power (in dB) of alpha, slow gamma and fast gamma bands with time (Fig 3 , 4th, 5th and 6th columns respectively) also showed visually similar trends.…”
Section: Baseline Psds and Slopes Are Comparablesupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To reduce the line noise artefact, we estimated the mains noise component in long segments of data and subtracted the same [32] before re-computing the PSD (see Methods for details), which yielded similar PSDs using both amplifiers (Fig 1B). The slopes of the PSDs computed at two different frequency ranges (16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34) Hz and 54-88 Hz as per our previous report [13]) were not significantly different between OpenBCI Visually similar results were obtained in the baseline-subtracted time frequency spectra of OpenBCI (first column) and Brain Products (second column). The change in power from baseline during stimulus at each frequency (Figure 3, third column), and the change in mean band power (in dB) of alpha, slow gamma and fast gamma bands with time (Fig 3 , 4th, 5th and 6th columns respectively) also showed visually similar trends.…”
Section: Baseline Psds and Slopes Are Comparablesupporting
confidence: 82%
“…We assessed the performance of OpenBCI, a popular affordable amplifier which provides a good cost-effectiveness [26], in the detection of gamma rhythms when static full-field gratings known to elicit gamma rhythms [12] were presented to healthy human subjects. OpenBCI recordings were compared to the recordings obtained using Brain Products GmbH, a popular research-grade amplifier, under identical experimental conditions on the same subjects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A low-cost, consumer-grade wearable EEG device would have channels ranging from 2 to 14 channels [ 58 ]. As seen from Figure 6 , the ease of setup while wearing a low-cost, consumer-grade wearable EEG headset provides comfort and reduces the complexity of setting up the device on the user's scalp, which is important for both researchers and users [ 63 ]. Even with the lower performance of wearable low-cost EEG devices, it is much more affordable compared to the standard clinical-grade EEG amplifiers [ 64 ].…”
Section: Emotionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, virtual industrial installations, such as the one presented in [35], and distant education, in particular aiming at the current efforts to develop so-called digital intelligence [36] or supporting people with special needs, such as autism spectrum disorder [37]. It is also planned to utilize LIRKIS G-CVE for future versions of the experiments described in [38,39], which focus on an assessment of VR influence on visuospatial cognitive functions [40]. Other applications, already under development, are training of civil engineering personnel, safety training and visualization of data from physical experiments in virtual environments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%