2017
DOI: 10.1101/195727
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accessibility of the Shine–Dalgarno sequence dictates N-terminal codon bias inE. coli

Abstract: Despite considerable effort, no physical mechanism has been experimentally shown to explain the N-terminal codon bias in prokaryotic genomes. Using a systematic study of synonymous substitutions in two endogenous E. coli genes, we show that interactions between the coding region and the upstream Shine-Dalgarno sequence modulate both the rate of mRNA degradation and the efficiency of translation-initiation via a 'ribosome-protection' mechanism, which ultimately affects cellular fitness. We further demonstrate t… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This interpretation rests upon the assumption that most mRNAs are stable enough to contribute to measurements of steady-state abundance. There are various reports of mutations or modifications that affect mRNA levels and protein levels differently (18,19,54,66,69), supporting the idea that translation efficiency can indeed be estimated by comparing protein levels to mRNA levels. Using this assumption and definition of translation efficiency, the Mtb data imply that there is no global difference in translation efficiency for leadered vs. leaderless transcripts.…”
Section: Downloaded Frommentioning
confidence: 88%
“…This interpretation rests upon the assumption that most mRNAs are stable enough to contribute to measurements of steady-state abundance. There are various reports of mutations or modifications that affect mRNA levels and protein levels differently (18,19,54,66,69), supporting the idea that translation efficiency can indeed be estimated by comparing protein levels to mRNA levels. Using this assumption and definition of translation efficiency, the Mtb data imply that there is no global difference in translation efficiency for leadered vs. leaderless transcripts.…”
Section: Downloaded Frommentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Inactivation of mRNA by intramolecular secondary structures is a well-acknowledged cause for inefficient translation in cell-free systems (58,79,90). Intramolecular base pairing occluding the Shine-Dalgarno (SD) sequence can greatly reduce the probability of translation initiation and affect protein levels in vivo (91). Whereas tight coupling between the rate of transcription and translation initiation limits formation of inhibitory RNA structures and ensures efficient usage of mRNA, the level of cooperation between these two processes is low in the T7 RNA polymerasebased PURE system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prototypical example is represented by riboswitches in which binding to a metabolite results in structural changes within the 5′ UTR that inhibit gene expression (50). Bacteria have evolved to minimize binding between the CDS and respective SD sequences to promote efficient translation initiation and thus enhance fitness (51). Nevertheless, although much less common, long-distance cis-interactions between the CDS and SD sequences have been reported to influence expression of genes important for thermostresses or growth rate (52)(53)(54).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%