1993
DOI: 10.1016/0167-4889(93)90171-k
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accessibility of hepatocyte protein thiols to monobromobimane

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

1995
1995
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…GSH (0-25 µM) treated with 250 µM monobromobimane and suspended in the same buffer was used as standard. Because this method has been shown with hepatocytes not to derivatize all protein thiols, analyses were also performed with 5 mM (final concentration) monobromobimane in the presence of 0.1 % Triton X-100 to maximize the exposure of thiol groups [19]. The total number of thiols detected under these conditions was three times that with the lower monobromobimane concentration, but in a control experiment it was found that the proportion of thiols lost was the same at both monobromobimane concentrations.…”
Section: Protein Thiolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GSH (0-25 µM) treated with 250 µM monobromobimane and suspended in the same buffer was used as standard. Because this method has been shown with hepatocytes not to derivatize all protein thiols, analyses were also performed with 5 mM (final concentration) monobromobimane in the presence of 0.1 % Triton X-100 to maximize the exposure of thiol groups [19]. The total number of thiols detected under these conditions was three times that with the lower monobromobimane concentration, but in a control experiment it was found that the proportion of thiols lost was the same at both monobromobimane concentrations.…”
Section: Protein Thiolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Total free thiols were measured by a reaction with monobromobimane (mBBr) leading to the formation of a stable fluorescent adduct [25,26]. RKO cells were seeded in a 6-well plate at a density of 3.5 × 10 5 cells/well.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The disadvantage, as compared with isoelectric focussing, is the rather low separation efficiency . 20 potential target proteins were identified by the specific labelling of the cysteines with monobromobimane (mBBr) (Kobrehel et al, 1992;Weis et al, 1993).…”
Section: Gel-based (2d Gel Electrophoresis) Labelling Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%