Accessibility of Date Picker for Touchscreens

Mehta, Yash; Joshi, Anirudha; Joshi, Manjiri; Jadhav, Charudatta

doi:10.1145/3014362.3014368

Cited by 5 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Date pickers present challenges due to their complex controls and the multitude of values to select [13,69,70]. In this study, only one participant managed to add the correct date during their second attempt, indicating the high level of inaccessibility of the date picker.…”

Section: " -[V01]mentioning

confidence: 82%

“…In this study, only one participant managed to add the correct date during their second attempt, indicating the high level of inaccessibility of the date picker. To enhance accessibility, date pickers should prioritize the month view as the default, with the option to switch to the year view using a pinch gesture and provide either a spinner or an editable text box for entering the day [69]. Flight booking webpages can adopt a similar user interface design to improve accessibility for VI individuals.…”

Section: " -[V01]mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Accessibility first: detecting frustration in web browsing for visually impaired and sighted smartphone users

Abdelaal,

Al-Thani

2023

Univ Access Inf Soc

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Smartphone adoption has become increasingly prevalent in modern society, reflecting the widespread integration of these devices into various aspects of daily life, yet accessibility and usability problems persist. Smartphones pose numerous challenges to individuals with visual impairments (VI). This is due to smaller screen sizes, lack of physical buttons, and prevalent problems. These challenges frustrate users as they are unable to accomplish their goals. In this paper, the physiological response of VI and sighted individuals are compared and examined. The participant's frustration is measured through physiological signals. The GSR is the signal captured to detect the user's frustration caused by the superimposed accessibility and usability web-related issues. GSR, being less obtrusive, is an effective way to measure frustration. There were 13 VI and 16 sighted participants. Using a within-subject and between-subject design, participants completed four tasks, each was completed under frustrating and non-frustrating conditions while wearing an Empatica E4 wristband to collect GSR data. Challenges were both group-specific and mutual. A slowed internet connection and constant page refreshes are frustrating tasks for sighted participants. VI participants faced an unsearchable drop-down list and an inaccessible menu. Pop-up ads and session timeout are common tasks. Among VI participants, there was no significant difference between frustrating and non-frustrating tasks. When VI participants experienced a session timeout, they significantly showed a higher level of arousal. When comparing the physiological responses of sighted and VI participants in the page refresh and session timeout tasks, the results show that the arousal level is significantly higher in VI participants, primarily due to accessibility issues.

show abstract

Section: " -[V01]mentioning

confidence: 82%

Section: " -[V01]mentioning

confidence: 99%

Accessibility first: detecting frustration in web browsing for visually impaired and sighted smartphone users

Abdelaal,

Al-Thani

2023

Univ Access Inf Soc

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Zhong et al (2015) augmented the touch feature of ANDROID devices in order to facilitate less precision to a targeted location and assist with gestures that might not be suitable for individuals with tremors, e.g., doubletapping the same location. Mehta et al (2016) conducted an empirical study-involving 12 blind users-to study the accessibility of date-pickers and proposed to augment the current capabilities of mobile devices with additional features able to support blind users. On a similar note, Xie et al (2015) focused on the understanding and improvement of the support provided for GUIs responsiveness when connecting smartphones to external displays, while Milne et al (2014) studied the accessibility of mobile health sensors for blind users: interestingly, they found that most of the accessibility problems identified could be solved with a small amount of effort.…”

Section: Accessibility: State Of the Artmentioning

confidence: 99%

The making of accessible Android applications: an empirical study on the state of the practice

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Nowadays, mobile applications represent the principal means to enable human interaction. Being so pervasive, these applications should be made usable for all users: accessibility collects the guidelines that developers should follow to include features allowing users with disabilities (e.g., visual impairments) to better interact with an application. While research in this field is gaining interest, there is still a notable lack of knowledge on how developers practically deal with the problem: (i) whether they are aware and take accessibility guidelines into account when developing apps, (ii) which guidelines are harder for them to implement, and (iii) which tools they use to be supported in this task. To bridge the gap of knowledge on the state of the practice concerning the accessibility of mobile applications, we adopt a mixed-method research approach with a twofold goal. We aim to (i) verify how accessibility guidelines are implemented in mobile applications through a coding strategy and (ii) survey mobile developers on the issues and challenges of dealing with accessibility in practice. The key results of the study show that most accessibility guidelines are ignored when developing mobile apps. This behavior is mainly due to the lack of developers’ awareness of accessibility concerns and the lack of tools to support them during the development.

show abstract

“…Hal ini dikarenakan format pemilihan tanggal lahir menggunakan date picker (dalam antarmuka ini digunakan date picker spinner atau date picker Cupertino) yang mengharuskan responden melakukan scroll up and down. Berdasarkan Mehta dkk[19], dikatakan bahwa date picker sebaiknya tidak digunakan untuk input tanggal lahir dan…”

unclassified

Evaluasi dan Perancangan Ulang Tampilan Antarmuka Aplikasi SehatQ Terhadap Lansia

Konda¹,

Restyandito²,

Nugraha³

2022

AITI

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Penelitian ini berfokus pada rancangan desain ulang antarmuka aplikasi SehatQ yang baik bagi lansia dengan umur 60 tahun ke atas. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah membangun ulang antarmuka aplikasi SehatQ yang lebih user friendly pada lansia. Objek yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah antarmuka aplikasi SehatQ v1.24.0, dimana di dalam aplikasi ini ditemukan beberapa kesalahan dalam desain antarmuka sehingga penggunaannya dapat menyulitkan lansia. Menurut ISO 9241-11, evaluasi kualitas dapat dilakukan dengan menghitung effectiveness, efficiency, dan satisfaction. Penelitian ini juga menggunakan metode User Centered Design atau UCD untuk mengetahui apa saja kebutuhan lansia terhadap antarmuka aplikasi sehingga penelitian dapat dikatakan tepat sasaran. Dari hasil pengujian usability pada antarmuka yang didesain ulang, ditemukan peningkatan nilai persentase efektivitas, efisiensi, dan kepuasan. Dengan peningkatan tersebut, dapat disimpulkan bahwa hasil desain ulang antarmuka aplikasi SehatQ dapat diterima oleh pengguna lansia.

show abstract

Accessibility of Date Picker for Touchscreens

Cited by 5 publications

References 4 publications

Accessibility first: detecting frustration in web browsing for visually impaired and sighted smartphone users

Accessibility first: detecting frustration in web browsing for visually impaired and sighted smartphone users

The making of accessible Android applications: an empirical study on the state of the practice

Evaluasi dan Perancangan Ulang Tampilan Antarmuka Aplikasi SehatQ Terhadap Lansia

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About