Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
1990
DOI: 10.1097/00005650-199001000-00007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Access to Office-Based Physicians Under Capitation Reimbursement and Medicaid Case Management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Under PCCM, they may continue to limit Medicaid patients or stop accepting them altogether. Many early PCCM programs were implemented with compromises, including fee increases, the inclusion of outpatient departments and other established sites as primary care providers, and less than vigorous enforcement of gate-keeping requirements in order to avoid disrupting existing Medicaid delivery systems (Hohlen et al 1990;Hurley, Freund, and Paul 1993;Schoenman, Evans, and Schur 1997). States implementing PCCM have been urged to carefully recruit and make attempts to retain physicians, and to maintain or increase physician reimbursement rates in order to avoid the loss of participating physicians (Smith, Des Jardins, and Peterson 2000;Norton and Zuckerman 2000).…”
Section: Earlier Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under PCCM, they may continue to limit Medicaid patients or stop accepting them altogether. Many early PCCM programs were implemented with compromises, including fee increases, the inclusion of outpatient departments and other established sites as primary care providers, and less than vigorous enforcement of gate-keeping requirements in order to avoid disrupting existing Medicaid delivery systems (Hohlen et al 1990;Hurley, Freund, and Paul 1993;Schoenman, Evans, and Schur 1997). States implementing PCCM have been urged to carefully recruit and make attempts to retain physicians, and to maintain or increase physician reimbursement rates in order to avoid the loss of participating physicians (Smith, Des Jardins, and Peterson 2000;Norton and Zuckerman 2000).…”
Section: Earlier Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 Numerous studies suggest that resource use is lower for HMO enrollees, 18 even when the same doctors care for HMO and fee-for-service patients; few studies suggest, however, that these decreases have been imprudent or have caused the health status of patients to worsen. 19,20 Several strong studies suggest that preventive services, such as immunization 21 and screening tests, 7 have been delivered more reliably in managed-care organizations than in feefor-service systems. The strongest negative finding to date about the performance of HMOs has been the observation in the Medical Outcomes Study that fee-for-service patients were more satisfied than HMO patients with their visits to physicians' offices.…”
Section: What the Data Showmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 Numerous studies suggest that resource use is lower for HMO enrollees, 18 even when the same doctors care for HMO and fee-for-service patients; few studies suggest, however, that these decreases have been imprudent or have caused the health status of patients to worsen. 19,20 Several strong studies suggest that preventive services, such as immunization 21 and screening tests, 7 have been delivered more reliably in managed-care organizations than in feefor-service systems. The strongest negative finding to date about the performance of HMOs has been the observation in the Medical Outcomes Study that fee-for-service patients were more satisfied than HMO patients with their visits to physicians' offices.…”
Section: What the Data Showmentioning
confidence: 99%