Access to Information, Higher Education, and Reputational Risk: Insights from a Case Study

Lamoureux, Patrick

doi:10.1017/cls.2019.36

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 34 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Así, por ejemplo, estos datos han sido utilizados para evaluar implementación de leyes de acceso a la información en algunos países de Europa (Dragos, Kovač & Marseille, 2018), de Latinoamérica (Michener, 2015), de la India y sus diferentes Estados (Roberts, 2010), y para desarrollar un prototipo de índice internacional de transparencia (Lidberg, 2009). A nivel nacional, el número de solicitudes y reclamaciones han sido utilizados para comparar el desempeño en materia de transparencia de diferentes órganos estatales, tales como Agencias Federales (Baker, 2015); Municipios (Ben-Aaron, Denny, Desmarais & Wallach, 2017; Poole, 2019), Departamentos de Policía (Kingston, Elliott & Thomas, 2019) y Universidades (Lamoureux, 2019).…”

Section: 4-número De Solicitudes De Acceso a La Información Y Reclama...unclassified

Estudio exploratorio sobre el número de solicitudes de acceso a la información y reclamaciones a nivel internacional comparado

Villalobos

2023

RET

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Un pilar de la transparencia es el derecho de los ciudadanos de solicitar información de sus gobiernos, con la posibilidad de reclamar en caso de recibir respuestas insatisfactorias. Para 2020, 127 países aprobaron Leyes de Acceso a la Información, y 92 crearon órganos de control para conocer las reclamaciones. La literatura señala que, en teoría, el número de solicitudes y reclamaciones podrían ser variables para medir la transparencia de los países. Sin embargo, se desconoce cuál sería la tasa media o estándar a nivel comparado. Utilizando datos de los informes anuales de los órganos de control y de población, se ha obtenido que tasa media de solicitudes a nivel comparado es 420 al año/100.000 habitantes, la tasa media de reclamaciones es 20 al año/100.000 habitantes, y la tasa media de solicitudes exitosas es 89%. Estas variables no están asociadas a otros factores de transparencia, como ingreso y libertad de prensa.

show abstract

Section: 4-número De Solicitudes De Acceso a La Información Y Reclama...unclassified

Estudio exploratorio sobre el número de solicitudes de acceso a la información y reclamaciones a nivel internacional comparado

Villalobos

2023

RET

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Reputation Management of the Higher Education Institutions On the Basis of Social Responsibility

Khovrak¹

2019

The economic discourse

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction. Higher education institutions (HEIs) play a special role in shaping society, so they must both disseminate knowledge of the world experience of social responsibility and adhere to the principles of social responsibility. HEIs should be actively involved in community initiatives, inter-sectoral dialogue, and help to develop regional and national policy standards. In turn, the social responsibility of institutions leads to a strengthening of their reputation. Therefore, the purpose of the article is to substantiate the role of social responsibility of higher education institutions in building their reputational capital. Methods. The following methods were used in the study: quantitative and content analysis of the literary sources of the Web of Science Core Collection database (for the period 1970-2019) on the topics "reputation", "reputation capital" and "reputation of higher education institutions"; comparative analysis of the results of the World Reputation Rankings rankings for the period 2011-2019 and the key performance indicators of the TOP-10 HEIs; graphical, abstract and logical methods – to substantiate the cooperation of HEI with stakeholders; method of scientific generalization – to reflect the expediency of managing the reputation of HEI on the basis of social responsibility. Results. The interest of scientists on the topic of managing the reputation of HEI in the context of countries, directions and years are analysed in the article. The analysis of the World Reputation Rankings indicators revealed the common features and differences of the TOP-10 HEI by the following criteria: reputation level, cost of education, living expenses, salary after 10 years, number of students per teacher, percentage of foreign students, ratio of students to women and men, number of full-time students. The author considered various options of cooperation of HEI with stakeholders, and also outlined the strategic advantages of forming HEI’s reputation capital on the principles of social responsibility. Discussion. Further research is planned to be conducted on developing a model for ensuring the development of HEIs based on social responsibility. Keywords: higher education institutions, social responsibility, reputation, reputational risks, rating.

show abstract

Access to Information, Higher Education, and Reputational Risk: Insights from a Case Study

Cited by 2 publications

References 34 publications

Estudio exploratorio sobre el número de solicitudes de acceso a la información y reclamaciones a nivel internacional comparado

Estudio exploratorio sobre el número de solicitudes de acceso a la información y reclamaciones a nivel internacional comparado

Reputation Management of the Higher Education Institutions On the Basis of Social Responsibility

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About