Access to healthcare for disabled individuals: An analysis of judgments of the European Court of Human Rights from an ethical perspective

Abstract

IntroductionIndividuals with disabilities (ID) suffer from restricted access to healthcare. This contributes to their poorer health status and constitutes an ethical challenge. The aim of this research was to systematically analyze judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) to illustrate examples of restricted access to healthcare for ID.MethodsThrough a search in the ECtHR's database we identified judgments dealing with access to healthcare for ID. The search resulted in n = 329 judgments, of which n = 55 were included in the analysis. A descriptive statistic was performed on Articles of the European Convention on Human Rights and violation of these articles. Qualitative thematic analysis was conducted to group the judgments in thematic categories.ResultsMost applications were filed against Russia (n = 23), followed by Poland (n = 8) and Ukraine (n = 7). The youngest applicant was 18, the oldest 72 years old. An overwhelming majority of cases dealt with disabled prisoners. Most of the judgments involved Article 14 and Article 8. We identified seven partially overlapping categories representing thematic patterns in the analyzed judgments.DiscussionAny restriction of access to healthcare can be considered a violation of human rights. However, the results show a relatively low total number of judgments dealing with limited access to healthcare for ID. This could be a further confirmation of the fact that ID still experience too little attention in our societies. Especially in the context of detention, ID is restricted from receiving the healthcare they require. Indirect ways of a restricted access to healthcare should not be overseen.

Access to healthcare for people living with HIV: an analysis of judgments of the European Court of Human Rights from an ethical perspective

“…Therefore, they are especially valuable for analysis of issues related to discrimination and abuse of individuals from minority groups. As has been shown previously, systematic categorization and assessment of ECtHR’s judgments allows a better understanding and illustration of medico-ethical and legal discourses on discrimination of vulnerable groups in healthcare ( 19 – 23 ). Moreover, since 46 Member States of the Council of Europe can request the ECtHR to review a case, the analysis of the Court’s proceedings provides valuable information on offenses against Human Rights in the Member States of this organization.…”

Based on the relationship between anxiety of existential meaninglessness, hope level, and fear of progression, explored the effect of preoperative nursing with Orem theory in the senile cataract population

“…Nursing plays a vital role in patients' holistic medical care journey (Skuban-Eiseler et al, 2023), with preoperative care before cataract surgery emerging as a critical area for innovation through the application of Orem's theory. Previous research, including a crosssectional study, has highlighted the correlation between levels of hope, fear, and a sense of meaninglessness, pinpointing these as key factors influencing patient outcomes.…”

Generating a Novel Artificial Intelligence-Based Decision-Making Model for Determining Priority Strategies for Improving Community Health

“…Environmental factors such as climate change, noise pollution, and the amount of green space are also factors that add to the shaping of community health. It is possible to contribute to the improvement of public health by reducing noise pollution, increasing the amount of green space, and fighting against climate change in the right way [2].…”