Access to health care for older people with intellectual disability: a modelling study to explore the cost-effectiveness of health checks

Abstract

Background Whilst people with intellectual disability grow older, evidence has emerged internationally about the largely unmet health needs of this specific ageing population. Health checks have been implemented in some countries to address those health inequalities. Evaluations have focused on measuring process outcomes due to challenges measuring quality of life outcomes. In addition, the cost-effectiveness is currently unknown. As part of a national guideline for this population we sought to explore the likely cost-effectiveness of annual health checks in England. Methods Decision-analytical Markov modelling was used to estimate the cost-effectiveness of a strategy, in which health checks were provided for older people with intellectual disability, when compared with standard care. The approach we took was explorative. Individual models were developed for a selected range of health conditions, which had an expected high economic impact and for which sufficient evidence was available for the modelling. In each of the models, hypothetical cohorts were followed from 40 yrs. of age until death. The outcome measure was cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) were calculated. Costs were assessed from a health provider perspective and expressed in 2016 GBP. Costs and QALYs were discounted at 3.5%. We carried out probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Data from published studies as well as expert opinion informed parameters. Results Health checks led to a mean QALY gain of 0.074 (95% CI 0.072 to 0.119); and mean incremental costs of £4787 (CI 95% 4773 to 5017). For a threshold of £30,000 per QALY, health checks were not cost-effective (mean ICER £85,632; 95% CI 82,762 to 131,944). Costs of intervention needed to reduce from £258 to under £100 per year in order for health checks to be cost-effective. Conclusion Whilst findings need to be considered with caution as the model was exploratory in that it was based on assumptions to overcome evidence gaps, they suggest that the way health systems deliver care for vulnerable populations might need to be re-examined. The work was carried out as part of a national guideline and informed recommendations about system changes to achieve more equal health care provisions. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12889-019-6912-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

A qualitative study of the needs of older adults with intellectual disabilities

“…There was satisfaction with the quality supports for physical health needs, with individuals themselves reporting that their health was well looked after. However, both family carers and keyworkers agreed that there was a need for more regular screening, check‐ups and clinical contact, which is reflected in the international literature (Bauer et al, 2019; Robertson et al, 2014).…”

“…The literature in this area often concludes that, although the needs of adults with intellectual disabilities who are ageing is a growing field, further research is required (Innes et al, 2012; O’Dwyer et al, 2018). Furthermore, while there are quantitative studies in this area (e.g., Bauer et al, 2019; Bigby et al, 2004), qualitative studies provide important insights (e.g., Bigby et al, 2011; Northway et al, 2017; Northway et al, 2017). However, there are some limitations in the qualitative studies available, most notably that they generally focus on one perspective (e.g., Bigby & Knox, 2009 and the studies by Northway and colleagues) and when they do examine multiple perspectives they may concentrate on staff and family perspectives only (e.g., Bigby et al, 2011).…”

The interRAI Suite of Mental Health Assessment Instruments: An Integrated System for the Continuum of Care

“…The interRAI ID has been implemented in the state of New York (USA) and in Prince Edward Island (Canada). It was used in Ontario, Canada to support the closure of the province's last three large institutions for persons with intellectual disabilities (179,180,(182)(183)(184). Several other jurisdictions in the USA and Canada have announced plans to implement the ID.…”

“…All interRAI mental health assessments include items on intellectual disability, since persons with dual psychiatric and ID diagnoses are an important subpopulation in mental health settings. Several interRAI papers have examined persons with intellectual disabilities in trans-institutional settings (179,(185)(186)(187)(188)(189).…”

Health Policy Challenge for Breast Cancer Prevention: A Case Report

“…Moreover, these individuals live in community-based environments instead of institutions. Adults with mental retardation prefer to be treated by doctors who treat their healthy peers (Bauer et al, 2019). Notwithstanding, there are limited guidelines on these people's screening, especially regarding cardiovascular diseases and cancers (Mazon et al, 2019).…”