Access to general practice for Pacific peoples: a place for cultural competency

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Access to primary health care services has been identified as a problem for Pacific peoples. Although cost is the most frequently cited barrier to Pacific service utilisation, some research has indicated that access may also be influenced by features of mainstream primary care services. This study aimed to identify features of mainstream general practice services that act as barriers to accessing these services for Pacific peoples in order to explore strategies that providers could adopt to enable their practices to be more welcoming, accessible and appropriate for Pacific peoples. METHODS: Pacific participants were recruited through Pacific networks known to Pegasus Health and via ‘snowball’ sampling. In total, 20 participants participated in one of three focus groups. A semi-structured interview explored the participants’ views and experiences of mainstream general practice care. Thematic analysis was utilised to interpret the data. FINDINGS: The analysis revealed five themes highlighting non-financial features of mainstream general practice services that may influence the availability and acceptability of these services to Pacific peoples: language and communication; rushed consultations; appointment availability; reception; and Pacific presence. CONCLUSION: The findings indicate that all personnel within the primary care setting have the ability to directly engage in the improvement of the health status of Pacific peoples in New Zealand by developing cultural competency and incorporating flexibility and diversity into the care and service they provide. KEYWORDS: Pacific health care; access to health care; inequalities; cultural competency; New Zealand

Understanding the therapeutic alliance in stroke rehabilitation

“…Establishing and maintaining a therapeutic connection is considered vital to the quality of any clinical interaction involving Māori and Pacific Islanders (Lacey, Huria, Beckert, Gilles, & Pitama, 2011;Ludeke et al, 2012;McLellan, McCann, Worrall, & Harwood, 2013). It is important that this relationship acknowledges cultural-specific beliefs and values in order to augment trust and receptivity to the input provided (Lacey et al, 2011;McLellan et al, 2013).…”

Prescribing by nurse practitioners

“…In a report on Pacific patterns in primary health care (Davis, Suaalii‐Sauni, Lay‐Lee, & Pearson, ), it was identified that Pacific patients were heavily concentrated in the most deprived areas with 45% of Pacific patients in decile 10. The reason for the lower proportion of Pacific patients in our study is likely to be multifactorial; with few NPs identifying as Pacific, access to health services reported as being more challenging because of cost, transport, and appointment availability as well as language barriers, poor communication, and rushed consultations (Ludeke et al., ). Further studies are needed to identify the extent to which NPs are improving access to those patients with the greatest health needs.…”

Awareness and use of family planning methods among iTaukei women in Fiji and New Zealand

“…Lower awareness among this group may be due to lower levels of engagement with mainstream society compared to women in Fiji, leading to limited exposure to family planning information. Studies have found that, along with cost 30,31 and language, 32,33 cultural sensitivities are important barriers to accessing reproductive services 32,34 . Thus, although living in urban areas increases women's likelihood of being exposed to family planning messages, 35–37 iTaukei women's ability to make sense of the information being shared may be challenged by language barriers and cultural sensitivities, e.g.…”