“…The rise of the 'evaluative' and 'regulatory' state and the implementation of what have variously been depicted as new public management (NPM) tools have become an increasingly ubiquitous mode of governance applied equally to the higher education sector (Christensen & Laegreid, 2010;Dill, 1998;Levi-Faur, 2005). Like numerous other sectors (electricity, water, sanitation, telecommunications, roads, rail, ports and airports, finance and health -among others), higher education too has become progressively subject to regulation by agencies who 'undertake the classic regulatory functions of setting standards, monitoring activities, and applying enforcement to secure behaviour modification where this is required' (King, 2007, p. 413; see also Carroll, 2014) Unlike other sectors, however, the sheer scale of governance by regulation, especially through specific instrumentalities like quality assurance regimes, has been remarkable in its geographic reach (Christensen & Laegreid, 2010;Dill, 1998;Levi-Faur, 2005). By one count, for example, nearly half the countries in the world now have quality assurance systems or QA regulatory bodies for higher education (Martin, 2007; see also Jarvis, this issue).…”