2016
DOI: 10.1080/14427591.2016.1151457
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Access to and use of everyday technology among older people: An occupational justice issue – but for whom?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The figures are similar in Germany [ 47 ]. Another reason for nonparticipation and dropout can be apprehension concerning cognitive accessibility or that the content is not user-friendly [ 22 , 48 , 49 ], but the patients in this study found the app to be user-friendly with relevant content, although it might not be so for all patients. Another strength of this study is the high adherence to daily reporting indicating that the use of mHealth is promising as an important tool in clinical care.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The figures are similar in Germany [ 47 ]. Another reason for nonparticipation and dropout can be apprehension concerning cognitive accessibility or that the content is not user-friendly [ 22 , 48 , 49 ], but the patients in this study found the app to be user-friendly with relevant content, although it might not be so for all patients. Another strength of this study is the high adherence to daily reporting indicating that the use of mHealth is promising as an important tool in clinical care.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reasons for this include insufficient access, computer illiteracy, reduced functional capacity, lack of motivation or interest, and decreased financial capability (Kottorp et al, 2016;Leist, 2013;Olphert & Damodaran, 2013). Aside from age-related health and ability, other factors that influence seniors' adoption of technology in daily life are self-efficacy, social relationships, attitude to life and satisfaction, facilitating conditions, as well as, perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use (Chen & Chan, 2014;Davis, 1989).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, eHealth literacy may be negatively affected with higher age [48] and the anticipated psychosocial impact for web-based eHealth applications has been shown to negatively correlate with increasing age [49]. Regardless of the underlying reason(s) for not using EICTs, there is a risk of inequality between users and non-users [50] which often means that younger people benefit from using the EICTs whilst older adults do not. In Sweden, 18% of citizens 76 years of age or older experience public digital services available to all citizens (e.g., e-services in healthcare, public transport and the Swedish tax Agency) as making life more difficult whilst younger age groups consider digital services as simplifying life [32].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%