2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.telpol.2011.08.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Access regulation and infrastructure investment in the mobile telecommunications industry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(39 reference statements)
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, there is an inverted U relationship between competition and investment in the telecommunication industry. This relationship highlighted by (Aghion, Bloom, Blundell, & gri¢ th, 2005) between competition and innovation has been extended between competition and investment in several empirical studies (Friederiszick, Grajek, & Röller), (Kim, Kim, Gaston, Lestage, & Kim Y & Flacher, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…As a result, there is an inverted U relationship between competition and investment in the telecommunication industry. This relationship highlighted by (Aghion, Bloom, Blundell, & gri¢ th, 2005) between competition and innovation has been extended between competition and investment in several empirical studies (Friederiszick, Grajek, & Röller), (Kim, Kim, Gaston, Lestage, & Kim Y & Flacher, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…The negative effect of MNS implementations can best be measured qualitatively. Previous studies have identified several problems with network sharing [5], [10], [11], [14], [21]. Four competition-harm factors measure the negative effect of MNS implementations in this study, including the suppression of FBC, increased government regulation, reduced QoS, and hindered service innovation.…”
Section: Decision-making Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Offering services based on ownership of network operations requires access to spectrum, which is a scarce resource [36]. In recent years, some national regulatory bodies have allowed mobile operators that do not possess their own frequency spectrum and infrastructure to lease the network facilities from Mobile Network Operators or MNOs [19]. MVNOs are a current ad hoc market solution for limited supply of spectrum, high demand for mobile services and regulatory desire for increased competition.…”
Section: Id An Example Of Secondary Spectrum Market Players: Mvnosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using MVNOs to empirically examine whether a regulatory policy promoting competition undermines the dynamic efficiency of the sector in terms of investment, [19] finds that granting market access to MVNOs may have unwanted consequences. In particular, it may lead to smaller infrastructure investment by incumbent MNOs, which may lead to undesirable results in the long-term, such as as delayed deployment of advanced networks, poor service quality, and slow technological advances.…”
Section: Ivb Regulation In Spectrum Marketsmentioning
confidence: 99%