2010
DOI: 10.1117/12.856518
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ACCESS pointing control system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…35 calculated the contrast degradation sensitivities due to errors in telescope pointing and mask centering (see also Refs. [36][37][38]. The pointing stability requirements for Zodiac II are guided by those calculations, which translate to a 0.4 arcsec RMS line-of-sight stability for the telescope body-pointing and a 0.04 arcsec RMS coronagraph mask centering error.…”
Section: Pointing Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…35 calculated the contrast degradation sensitivities due to errors in telescope pointing and mask centering (see also Refs. [36][37][38]. The pointing stability requirements for Zodiac II are guided by those calculations, which translate to a 0.4 arcsec RMS line-of-sight stability for the telescope body-pointing and a 0.04 arcsec RMS coronagraph mask centering error.…”
Section: Pointing Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the microvibrations induced by mechanical moving devices onboard spacecrafts, such as flywheels, solar array drive motors and cryo-coolers could undermine the stability of the bus seriously, causing deleterious effects on the pointing performance (Brugarolas et al, 2010;Oh et al, 2013). Therefore, more and more attentions have been turned to dealing with the microvibration problems of the spacecrafts in recent years (Lillie et al, 2010;Tan et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 8 shows the contrast deltas (vs. four specifications of rms surface quality on the optical elements following the primary mirror) due to beamwalk on the optics upstream of the fine steering mirror. The telescope attitude control system, augmented by a fine steering mirror within the coronagraph, stabilizes the star image on the coronagraph occulting mask (all four coronagraphs have a focal plane occulting mask) to 0.45 milliarcsec (3σ) 24 , as required for high contrast at inner working angles as small as 2 λ/D, as indicated in Figure 8. …”
Section: Systems: Pointing Control and Thermal Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Telescope body pointing (the LOS) is stabilized to 1 milliarcsec (3σ) with an active jitter control system 24 . Figure 8 shows the contrast deltas (vs. four specifications of rms surface quality on the optical elements following the primary mirror) due to beamwalk on the optics upstream of the fine steering mirror.…”
Section: Systems: Pointing Control and Thermal Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%