“…| 395 AMORIM opportunities" and the empowerment of "systemically disadvantaged groups" (Lieven, 1989, p. 162); (ii) the higher education system's transformation: Parry (1989, p. 7) called this the "catalyst argument", i.e., "a means of changing teaching and learning" in higher education; (iii) the qualification of human resources (Lieven, 1989;Osborne, Leopold, & Ferrie, 1997;Parry, 1989); and (iv) institutional survival (Lieven, 1989;Nóvoa, 2007;Osborne, 2003;Parry, 1989;Woodley & Wilson, 2002), as the decrease in the number of "traditional" candidates Buchler, Castle, Osman, & Walters, 2007), i.e., youngsters between 18 and early 20s progressing directly from upper secondary to higher education, made mature students a valuable resource to overcome financial difficulties (Castle, Munro, & Osman, 2006). This means that, in some cases, institutions are driven by "opportunism" rather than by a commitment to the promotion of social justice or change (Nóvoa, 2007).…”