1994
DOI: 10.1016/0099-1333(94)90100-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Access and ownership in the academic environment: One library's progress report

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Each of these methods aims to generate a list, or lists, of journal titles that can represent what researchers would use, given certain assumptions. The collection management use to which these lists are put is often described in terms of journal cancellation exercises but, given the terms of the access/holdings debate [9,10], might be better described in terms of selecting the best sourcing option for each title. This paper is concerned with evaluating one of the techniques mentioned above, citation analysis, in terms of its practical value to librarians in making such selections.…”
Section: User Requirements Use and Citationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Each of these methods aims to generate a list, or lists, of journal titles that can represent what researchers would use, given certain assumptions. The collection management use to which these lists are put is often described in terms of journal cancellation exercises but, given the terms of the access/holdings debate [9,10], might be better described in terms of selecting the best sourcing option for each title. This paper is concerned with evaluating one of the techniques mentioned above, citation analysis, in terms of its practical value to librarians in making such selections.…”
Section: User Requirements Use and Citationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The collection management use to which these lists are put is often described in terms of journal cancellation exercises but, given the terms of the access / holdings debate [9,10], might be better described in terms of selecting the best sourcing option for each title.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thirty per cent of respondents to the ARL SPEC Kit 204, Uses of Document Delivery Services [6], report that they have a separate budget line for document delivery. The University of Arizona Libraries funds all ILL costs, except rush deliveries, from its information access budget, formerly the materials acquisition budget according to Brin and Cochran[9]. The library plans to fund another pilot project for access to commercial document delivery services such as UnCover.…”
Section: Review Of the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practical terms, in the 1990s, this generally meant relying less on acquisition of stock and more on interlibrary loans or document supply. Writing from an American perspective, Brin and Cochran (1994) note that such discussion can be traced back to the 1970s, but became the subject of many more articles from 1989 onwards, citing papers offering general overviews and particular viewpoints, as well as treatment of specific aspects or reference to the concept while discussing other issues. In the UK, published case studies indicate that the debate was often described as access versus holdings, rather than ownership (Baker, 1992;Corrall, 1993), but the issues were the same; Crawford and Gorman (1995, p. 133) also use the phrase "access vs. collection", arguing strongly that the discussion should not be about access versus collection, but about finding the right balance between access and collection.…”
Section: Innovation -Computer-based Servicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The case studies from the universities of Arizona, Aston and East Anglia all identify rising literature prices and inadequate library budgets as key drivers and technology as a critical enabler of the access strategies described (Baker, 1992;Brin and Cochran, 1994;Corrall, 1993).…”
Section: Innovation -Computer-based Servicesmentioning
confidence: 99%