The Lives of LGBT Older Adults: Understanding Challenges and Resilience. 2015
DOI: 10.1037/14436-006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Access and equity in the design and delivery of health and social care to LGBTQ older adults: A Canadian perspective.

Abstract: This chapter was developed with the financial support of the Centre de recherche et d'éxpertise en gérontologie sociale and the Centre de santé et de service sociaux Cavendish-Affilié universitaire.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
42
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
3
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, as Cronin and King (2010) have noted, some sexual minority older adults, for instance those with experience in cultivating heterosexual relations of kinship, may have access to more normative forms of kin-based support in old age. These adults, though often found to experience stigma and hostility in systems of care, primarily as a result of their perceived or self-proclaimed identification with nonheterosexuality in old age (Cronin and King 2010;Brotman et al 2015), may nonetheless identify with aspects of the nuclear family to varying extents. Rather than assuming an unequivocally universal inaccessibility to kin-based care among older LGBTQ adults, the current framework of hypervisibility locates varying expressions of distance from the nuclear family as being either perceived by others (e.g., service providers), or subjectively experienced by queer/trans older adults themselves, based on a vast array of characteristics and experiences that may or may not wholly preclude access to kin-based care.…”
Section: Situating Lgbtq Hypervisibility Within Neoliberal Governmentmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Indeed, as Cronin and King (2010) have noted, some sexual minority older adults, for instance those with experience in cultivating heterosexual relations of kinship, may have access to more normative forms of kin-based support in old age. These adults, though often found to experience stigma and hostility in systems of care, primarily as a result of their perceived or self-proclaimed identification with nonheterosexuality in old age (Cronin and King 2010;Brotman et al 2015), may nonetheless identify with aspects of the nuclear family to varying extents. Rather than assuming an unequivocally universal inaccessibility to kin-based care among older LGBTQ adults, the current framework of hypervisibility locates varying expressions of distance from the nuclear family as being either perceived by others (e.g., service providers), or subjectively experienced by queer/trans older adults themselves, based on a vast array of characteristics and experiences that may or may not wholly preclude access to kin-based care.…”
Section: Situating Lgbtq Hypervisibility Within Neoliberal Governmentmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Of importance, given the relative dearth of both empirical and theoretical inquiry in the area of queer/trans aging, many have drawn on this expression of omission itself as a conceptual basis for understanding the systemic invisibility of older LGBTQ adults across a range of dominant social and political contexts (Brotman et al 2015;Brown 2009;Eliason et al 2010;Knauer 2011;King 2014;Rose and Hospital 2015). For instance, in Knauer's (2011) comprehensive account of salient social and legal issues among older LGBTQ adults, this writer problematizes the paucity of an empirically informed knowledge base in the field of queer/trans aging, and frames this reality as a reflection of marginality among older sexual and gender minority adults.…”
Section: Rhetorical Silence: Lgbtq Aging and Academic Hegemonymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations