2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.106129
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acceptance of meat reduction policies in Switzerland

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(79 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since animal welfare, meat origin, and meat quality were concerns among consumers in both countries, providing more infrastructure for urban farming, participatory guarantee systems (PGS), and community-based, site-adapted farming projects could be effective solutions. For Switzerland, education on sustainable nutrition could be a promising intervention that is likely to be accepted by consumers, as Richter et al [73] showed in their study. Such projects could educate consumers about animal welfare and sustainable meat production.…”
Section: Recommendations For Interventions To Reduce Meat Consumptionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Since animal welfare, meat origin, and meat quality were concerns among consumers in both countries, providing more infrastructure for urban farming, participatory guarantee systems (PGS), and community-based, site-adapted farming projects could be effective solutions. For Switzerland, education on sustainable nutrition could be a promising intervention that is likely to be accepted by consumers, as Richter et al [73] showed in their study. Such projects could educate consumers about animal welfare and sustainable meat production.…”
Section: Recommendations For Interventions To Reduce Meat Consumptionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Spurling et al (2013, p. 4) observed that "understanding the dynamics of practices offers us a window into transitions towards sustainability", whereas according to James et al [70], policy interventions to reduce meat have drawn the attention of the scientific community and media. Such interventions could take the form of control of advertising (e.g., banning the advertising of meat products), information campaigns on the environmental impact of meat consumption, nutrition education, menus with information about nutrition and environmental scores, taxes, or the end of subsidies on meat [61,[71][72][73]. However, sustainable development policies often target individual behavior by introducing new technologies to produce products more efficiently or by changing consumer behavior and product choices [68].…”
Section: Theory: Interventions On Social Practicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Governments must, therefore, shoulder their responsibilities and pull all the levers at their disposal, including overhauling the food on offer in all state-run or subsidised restaurants, using a portfolio of regulatory measures and requiring private sector actors to participate in the effort and modify their offer accordingly. Several of these measures correspond to profound paradigm changes and will encounter political headwinds; resistance from the industry, retail and catering sectors; and even possibly from the populations of countries, as Richter et al (2022) highlighted in their study on the acceptance of meat reduction policies in Switzerland. Thus, the best approach is likely to commit to a common international agenda, agreeing on short-term goals to achieve and a common set of measures to implement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%