Acceptance of Enhanced Robotic Assistance Systems in People With Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis–Associated Motor Impairment: Observational Online Study

Abstract

Background Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a fatal neurodegenerative disease characterized by a progressive paresis of the extremities and the loss of manual functioning. Due to the severe functional impairment that the disease entails, ALS requires the provision of comprehensive nursing care and a complex set of assistive technology devices. To relieve caregivers and promote autonomy of people with ALS, robotic assistance systems are being developed. This trial aims to evaluate the acceptance of technology, in general, and of robotic arm assistance among people with ALS in order to lay the groundwork for the development of a semiautomatic robotic arm that can be controlled by humans via a multimodal user interface and that will allow users to handle objects and attend to their own bodies. Objective The aim of this study was to perform a systematic analysis of technology commitment and acceptance of robotic assistance systems from the perspective of physically limited people living with ALS. Methods The investigation was conducted as a study of a prospective cohort. Participants were only included if they had received a medical diagnosis of ALS. Data collection took place via an online questionnaire on the Ambulanzpartner Soziotechnologie internet platform. Technological commitment was measured using the Neyer short scale. Furthermore, a multidimensional questionnaire was specially developed to analyze participant acceptance of robotic arm assistance: the Acceptance Measure of Robotic Arm Assistance (AMRAA). This questionnaire was accompanied by a video introducing the robot arm. ALS severity was ascertained using the ALS Functional Rating Scale–Extended (ALSFRS-EX). Results A total of 268 people with ALS participated in the survey. Two-thirds of the participants were male. The overall mean ALS severity score was 42.9 (SD 11.7) points out of 60 on the ALSFRS-EX, with the most relevant restrictions on arms and legs (<60% of normal functioning). Technological commitment ranked high, with the top third scoring 47.2 points out of 60. Younger participants and males showed significantly higher values. The AMRAA score was, again, significantly higher among younger participants. However, the gender difference within the overall cohort was not significant. The more limited the arm functioning of participants according to the ALSFRS-EX subscale, the higher the acceptance rate of robotic assistance. This relationship proved significant. Conclusions People with ALS display high technological commitment and feel positive about using technological assistance systems. In our study, younger participants were more open to technology use, in general, and robotic assistance, in particular. Self-appraisal of technology acceptance, competence, and control conviction were generally higher among men. However, any presumed gender difference vanished when users were asked to rate the anticipated usefulness of the technology, in particular the robotic arm. The acceptance was also reflected in users’ increased willingness to use a robotic arm as the functionality of their own arms decreased. From the perspective of people with ALS, robotic assistance systems are critical to promoting individual autonomy. Another key consideration in the development of future assistive technologies should be the reduction of caregiver burden. Trial Registration German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00012803; https://tinyurl.com/w9yzduhd

Competencies in the Robotics of Care for Nursing Robotics: A Scoping Review

“…With regard to the results obtained from the search in the first phase, it should be stressed that most of them are oriented towards usability [ 42 ], acceptability [ 43 , 44 ] and ethical implications [ 45 ] among professionals. In this sense, Stokes and Palmer [ 46 ] have claimed that AI or AI carebot activities must meet three conditions: “first, it cannot transgress the core values of nursing—i.e., caring.…”

Technical Readiness and Stereotypes in Hospital Nursing—A Question of Gender and Age?

“…Regarding technical readiness and job satisfaction, we chose the short scales on general willingness to use technology and job satisfaction from the compilation of social science items (“ZIS”) of “GESIS–Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences e.V.” [ 18 , 19 ]. Other international studies also used these scales before [ 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 ]. We added questions regarding possible influences based on intensive consultation of nursing experts (nurses, nursing leaders and researchers).…”

Der Einsatz von Patient-reported Outcome Measures (PROM) und die Perspektive digitaler Biomarker bei der Amyotrophen Lateralsklerose

“…B. Scores zur Erfassung der Belastung durch nicht-invasive Beatmung [38] oder der Akzeptanz gegenüber komplexen Hilfsmitteln [39] Anwendung. Einzelne Items der ALSFRS-R wie auch deren Repräsentation durch digitale Biomarker könnten aufgrund ihrer klinischen Relevanz als Triggerpunkte für Versorgungsprozesse dienen.…”