2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.intman.2005.03.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acceptance of electronic monitoring and its consequences in different cultural contexts: A conceptual model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The system also provides functionality for monitoring electronic performance (Paninaa & Aiello, 2005), as the recorded data can be used to assess staff performance. Table 1 provides an overview of the different objectives and related functions of these systems.…”
Section: Sensor-based Medication Support Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The system also provides functionality for monitoring electronic performance (Paninaa & Aiello, 2005), as the recorded data can be used to assess staff performance. Table 1 provides an overview of the different objectives and related functions of these systems.…”
Section: Sensor-based Medication Support Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electronic performance monitoring (ERM) implies an assessment of the employee that can entail negative consequences. Therefore, cultures with a high degree of uncertainty avoidance are less likely to accept ERM than are those with a low degree of uncertainty avoidance (Paninaa & Aiello, 2005). The uncertainty associated with the work increases further when the employees do not receive the performance data (Aiello, 1993) and when they do not know whether ERM is being employed but suspect that it may be .…”
Section: Uncertainty Avoidancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some previous research showed that uncertainty avoidance has a significant effect on people's behavior (Hofstede & Bond, 1988, Panina & Aiello, 2005. This paper incorporates this cultural dimension in an e-commerce adoption model to see if there is any cultural difference between the two countries.…”
Section: Uncertainty Avoidancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings may be very important for companies and international traders in both countries that are thinking on technology transfer and engaging in online business by opening e-commerce businesses. Such technologies often presuppose values that run counter to local cultures (Panina & Aiello, 2005).…”
Section: Theoretical and Managerial Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main conclusion they drew was that SL occurred commonly in Western cultures, whereas it did not exist or was even reversed in other cultures. Similarly, Panina and Aiello (2004) stated that ‘it appears that SL is less likely in collectivistic societies when tasks are interrelated and cohesiveness and social interaction, as well as identification with the group, are higher’ (p.16). Considering these studies, it can be concluded that cultural disposition (individualism–collectivism) may have an impact on SL.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%