Acceptance of detergent‐retail brands: the role of consumer confidence and trust

Abstract

Purpose -The aim of this paper is to analyse the role of "trust" and "confidence/pessimism" in influencing consumer attitudes and buying intentions with respect to retail brands and products. Design/methodology/approach -Following a review of the relevant literature, the paper presents a conceptual model of buying intentions regarding retail brands. The model is then tested quantitatively by structural equation modelling analysis using a sample of 581 adult consumers that are decision makers in their households regarding purchases of detergent brands. Findings -The results show that the consumers' degree of confidence/pessimism regarding their general economic situation and their trust in retail brands are directly influencing the perceived benefits and indirectly their attitudes; the later having a direct impact on their purchase intentions. Research limitations/implications -Caution should be exercised in extrapolating the results from the present research context to other product categories and research settings. Practical implications -The variables of "trust" and "confidence/pessimism" facilitate a more effective utilisation of the marketing mix with regard to retail brands. Originality/value -The paper provides novel insights into consumer behaviour with regard to detergent retail brands. In particular, the variable of "confidence/pessimism" is especially relevant in the context of the prevailing adverse economic conditions.

Possible Causes Inhibiting the Purchase of Chinese Grocery Own Brands: A Preliminary Study

“…These factors are low price and high perceived quality (Burton et al 1998;Sinha, Batra 1999;Zielke, Dobbelstein 2007;Baltas, Argouslidis 2007;Anchor, Kourilova 2009). The research has further confirmed that the propensity to purchase own brands is greatly influenced by the relationship between price and quality (Gomez, Fernandez 2009;Lymperopoulos et al 2010), and the main driver of own brand acceptance is its relatively low price and the improved quality (Cooper, Nelson 2003;Lymperopoulos et al 2010). …”

“…There are various terms for own brands: own label, private label, house brand, retailer brand, and exclusive brand, store brand, etc., (DelVecchio 2001;Veloutsou et al 2004;Lymperopoulos et al 2010). These terms have been used by retailers and researchers interchangeably even though scholars such as McGoldrick believe these terms are different (2002).…”

The Evolution of Private Labels in Food Proposals: The Case of the Top Four Italian Retailers and the Purchase Propensity of Consumers

“…This last consideration could be also the consequence of the relevant selling results registered by this alternative value proposition or its developing differentiation, above all when there is a structured retail distribution system (Cuneo et al, 2015). PLs presence is surely not a novelty but, the continuous increasing market share is an important feature to observe (Calvo Porral, & Levy-Mangin, 2016), evaluating the strategic role in the competition among retailers (Lymperopoulos et al, 2010). PLs appeared in the market from the first decades of the last century, specifically from the 1930' in the U.S. context, thanks to the work of the major chain retailers, as noted by Call (1967).…”

Structural Model of the Role of Brand Trust on Brand Identity through the Mediating Role of Brand Love among Fans of Futsal Premier League Clubs in Iran

“…In addition, distrust is a useful mental state that enables us to get rid of systems or individuals and organizations that are unreliable and unhealthy (4). Another definition of trust in this way is the psychological state consisting of the acceptance of the vulnerability based on the behavior of the positive expectations of the other (5). Brand trust is the degree of brand ability and capacity to meet promises made.…”