The ionization and transmission efficiencies of an electrospray ionization (ESI) interface were investigated to advance the understanding of how these factors affect mass spectrometry (MS) sensitivity. In addition, the effects of the ES emitter distance to the inlet, solution flow rate, and inlet temperature were characterized. Quantitative measurements of ES current loss throughout the ESI interface were accomplished by electrically isolating the front surface of the interface from the inner wall of the heated inlet capillary, enabling losses on the two surfaces to be distinguished. In addition, the ES current lost to the front surface of the ESI interface was spatially profiled with a linear array of 340-m-diameter electrodes placed adjacent to the inlet capillary entrance. Current transmitted as gas-phase ions was differentiated from charged droplets and solvent clusters by measuring sensitivity with a single quadrupole mass spectrometer. The study revealed a large sampling efficiency into the inlet capillary (Ͼ90% at an emitter distance of 1 mm), a global rather than a local gas dynamic effect on the shape of the ES plume resulting from the gas flow conductance limit of the inlet capillary, a large (Ͼ80%) loss of analyte ions after transmission through the inlet arising from incomplete desolvation at a solution flow rate of 1.0 L/min, and a decrease in analyte ions peak intensity at lower temperatures, despite a large increase in ES current transmission efficiency. -6]. The sensitivity of ESI-MS is largely determined by the effectiveness of producing gas-phase ions from analyte molecules in solution (ionization efficiency) and the ability to transfer the charged species from atmospheric pressure to the low-pressure region of the mass analyzer (transmission efficiency) [7][8][9][10].Ionization efficiency is affected by a number of factors, such as flow rate, interface design, solvent composition, and analyte properties. In general, ionization efficiency increases as the liquid flow to the ES emitter decreases [11][12][13]. The primary reason for this increase is the production of smaller charged droplets at the lower flow rates [11,14]. The smaller droplets enable more efficient solvent evaporation and fewer coulombic fission events are required to create gasphase ions [11,14]. Also, the ES current in cone-jet mode increases approximately as the square root of the volumetric flow rate [14], increasing the number of available charges per analyte molecule as the flow rate decreases. Finally, smaller initial droplets and increased amount of charge available per analyte molecule improve the ionization of analytes with lower surface activity, improving quantitation and reducing matrix suppression effects [15,16]. In addition to its importance for transmission efficiency, the ESI interface on the mass spectrometer also plays a key role in ionization efficiency [17]. Adding energy to the charged droplets-such as using heated nitrogen as a background gas-enhances desolvation and liberates more analyte ions [17][18][...